送交者: skipper3 于 2006-3-05, 11:40:26:

回答: 说来说去还是一个老大难问题：产权。 由 skipper3 于 2006-3-05, 11:21:18:

所以默许了陈的做法。其实从艳阳糊上来的材料看，全部投资加起来也不过6百万刀，这样都投资项目失败在硅谷里每个星期都在发生。说到底还是，人人都在骂浮躁，但是这些人自己也很浮躁，只希望看到成功不敢接受失败，这就是中土高科技的投资环境。

• 投资失败不可怕，主要在利益纠葛和给人骗了。被人骗了和风险投资不一样。 - starfire (0 bytes) 2006-3-05, 13:46:36
  • 你接触过风险投资没有啊？ - skipper3 (458 bytes) 2006-3-05, 14:11:46
    • 你要认为投资方不是被骗了而是帮助陈骗国家钱，那是另一回事， - starfire (180 bytes) 2006-3-05, 14:27:06
      • I don't think you understand investing. - skipper3 (1670 bytes) 2006-3-05, 19:16:11
        • 呵呵，你把投资的将来风险和投资决策时现状的调查混为一谈。关键的问题是， - starfire (540 bytes) 2006-3-05, 20:17:36
          • NOt at all. There si no such thing as 将来风险. - skipper3 (858 bytes) 2006-3-05, 20:41:34
            • you mean as an individual investor one has to know - skipper3 (213 bytes) 2006-3-05, 20:46:40
              • ventual capital就是投资者 - starfire (0 bytes) 2006-3-05, 21:09:42
                • then you already have the answer. - skipper3 (167 bytes) 2006-3-05, 21:19:39
        • kao, it looks shit...lots of typos. But you get what I was saying - skipper3 (0 bytes) 2006-3-05, 19:30:56
  • 股民是不放心把钱交给被骗的傻子的 - starfire (0 bytes) 2006-3-05, 13:56:50

加跟贴