Supreme court health care debate shows that US is going down.

送交者: LB 于 2012-03-27, 12:24:01:

引用：

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. asked if the government could compel the purchase of cellphones. And Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked about forcing people to buy burial insurance.

这就是这帮大法官的水平？

所有跟贴:

我最近对这个事情感兴趣，谁在美国的概括社普一下？ (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 12:51:00 (655745)
- 看俺下面的 (无内容) - eddie (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:16:51 (655754)
  - 这贴忒周五。“看俺下面的”，紧跟着下面 “（无内容）” (无内容) - trus (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:21:26 (655759)
Alito的问题水平非常高 - eddie (14 bytes) 2012-03-27, 12:50:09 (655744)
- eddie, you occasionally jump out and show off a bit. - alabama (255 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:19:48 (655758)
- 嘻嘻 - cornbug (29 bytes) 2012-03-27, 12:56:42 (655747)
  - 你没明白他问的是什么 - eddie (538 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:16:14 (655753)
    - 开车必须系安全带这样的应该不算过分吧，这个算是在技术社会 - 蓝隼 (88 bytes) 2012-03-27, 16:34:55 (655806)
      - 个人自由和不能危及他人的区别 - eddie (66 bytes) 2012-03-27, 17:27:47 (655820)
        
        孕妇呢？ (无内容) - TGIF (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 22:40:07 (655852)
    - He was trivializing the argument. - LB (263 bytes) 2012-03-27, 15:09:23 (655782)
      - Obama should have pushed for universal coverage, but he didn't. - LB (362 bytes) 2012-03-27, 15:34:19 (655791)
    - 政府“强制”每个人都要交FICA Tax，是否也违宪？ (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 15:04:35 (655778)
      - FICA没有强制到每个人 - eddie (156 bytes) 2012-03-27, 15:55:50 (655800)
    - 你这个强加的"强制买保险"的理由也是为你的辩论服务的。 - 猎人 (37 bytes) 2012-03-27, 14:54:10 (655776)
      - 最主要的理由是"没有保险，就只能依赖急症" - 猎人 (182 bytes) 2012-03-27, 15:04:48 (655780)
        
        这又叫affordability act, 急症不存在affordable的问题 - 猎人 (192 bytes) 2012-03-27, 15:22:18 (655786)
        
        保险保的都是"in case", 难道买个burial insurance是怕万一死了？还有不死的？ (无内容) - 猎人 (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 15:31:49 (655790)
        
        It is not "in case you die". - alabama (73 bytes) 2012-03-27, 16:06:25 (655803)
        
        要是能afford, 这个保险就等于白买了？怎么鉴定affordability? (无内容) - 猎人 (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 16:20:58 (655804)
    - "公益"跟"affects others"有何区别？ (无内容) - 猎人 (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 14:29:16 (655770)
      - 在这个讨论里没什么区别 - eddie (36 bytes) 2012-03-27, 14:43:36 (655773)
    - what about liability insurence? all car owners need to buy that. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:19:20 (655756)
      - liaibility affects others - eddie (160 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:28:42 (655761)
        
        social insrance ? - cornbug (72 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:42:42 (655763)
        
        not about health insurance, but related your examples - steven (292 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:42:28 (655762)
        
        The difference is whether it affects others - eddie (225 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:47:34 (655764)
        
        能否简单归结于好的独裁是否违宪的争论？ (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:51:36 (655765)
        
        跟是否独裁没关系 - eddie (74 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:53:37 (655766)
        
        能否再深入归结于立国基础individualism的问题？我用词可能不当 (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:57:29 (655767)
        
        多新鲜啊 - eddie (28 bytes) 2012-03-27, 14:35:05 (655771)
        
        自我矛盾，interstate commerce本来就是宪法的一条，关键是怎么解释 - ASH (167 bytes) 2012-03-27, 14:20:17 (655769)
        
        个人主义只是性格，立国基础是主权在民 - eddie (358 bytes) 2012-03-27, 14:13:43 (655768)
    - 您老指出了看点。能否再深入一些 (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:19:09 (655755)
  - 不能跟eddie嬉皮笑脸。上次我开玩笑被他严肃地教训了。 (无内容) - 短江学者 (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 13:02:52 (655750)
这帮大法官的水平and their inteligence are - alabama (219 bytes) 2012-03-27, 12:32:38 (655737)
- Sorry but I mean "way, way ABOVE you" (无内容) - alabama (0 bytes) 2012-03-27, 12:37:51 (655740)

加跟贴