Obama should have pushed for universal coverage, but he didn't.


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: LB 于 2012-03-27, 15:34:19:

回答: He was trivializing the argument. 由 LB 于 2012-03-27, 15:09:23:

现在变成了关于公益的争论。但即便如此,作为大法官也该知道限定一个论点的范围而不应该将论题无聊化。类似的我还可以说文盲也该交文盲税因为你成为社会的负担来证明奥巴马法案的不合理。反过来以公益为理由的法律也到处都是,那些人怎么不去反对公共图书馆,义务教育,汽车保险liability呢?怎么不说Don't mess up with my education。You are using my tax money to educate poor people.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明