送交者: deadmeat 于 2006-2-21, 03:56:30:

回答: 单从技术角度来讲，要把一个木马程序打包进操作系统里会有难度吗 由 deadmeat 于 2006-2-21, 03:36:57:

没想到什么绕过OS去控制CPU的方法
不过intel几乎肯定会将无线网卡模块集成进CPU里，到时候直接用一串无线指令去控制CPU是有可能的。

还有路由器，防火墙等，硬件和OS都是同一家厂商提供的，而且都可以远程维护（以我知道的思科和华为）。如果系统有一个隐藏的管理员帐号的话，也很容易搞破坏。

实际上很多大型系统都会有一些调测接口（商用后有没有删掉只有厂商才知道），比如我手上这套系统，一条指令就可以让cp load上到90%（该指令本来只是在调试时模拟高负荷用的），在有管理员权限的情况下，要搞破坏真的是很容易。

• this is an absolute BS. Not only that you don't know CPU, - steven (55 bytes) 2006-2-21, 12:11:13
  • 假定现在我是CPU和wifi芯片的生产商 - deadmeat (247 bytes) 2006-2-21, 13:45:24
    • you don't even know how wi-fi works. I don't know what - steven (126 bytes) 2006-2-21, 14:56:08
  • 在GSM/CDMA网络中，我可以在交换机上面敲指令 - deadmeat (364 bytes) 2006-2-21, 13:18:48
    • you've talked to a wrong person, I'd worked on both - steven (159 bytes) 2006-2-21, 14:52:29
      • I worked on such a switch everyday ! - deadmeat (173 bytes) 2006-2-21, 15:04:47
        • okay if you know switch, the first thing is you have - steven (959 bytes) 2006-2-21, 15:41:13
          • 1. the operator will need the engineer from the equipment - deadmeat (1407 bytes) 2006-2-21, 16:15:14
            • the operator turned that on and off. There isn't - steven (1582 bytes) 2006-2-21, 17:04:53
              • hehe, why do they have to tell the operator how to change password - deadmeat (1108 bytes) 2006-2-21, 17:43:52
            • 厂商做手脚也不是非要什么政治军事目的 - deadmeat (345 bytes) 2006-2-21, 16:37:18
              • your vendor made a mistake and they would be fined for that - steven (86 bytes) 2006-2-21, 17:09:02
                • they claim it was a bug but it was not even a bug - deadmeat (112 bytes) 2006-2-21, 18:04:44

加跟贴