I'd like to see a factual piece in chrono order,

送交者: 猎人于 2012-02-08, 11:57:24:

回答: 关于斑竹和根伯的公案是不是可以复习一下俺的老三篇？由 eddie 于 2012-02-08, 11:14:47:

rather than an argumentative defense. I would like to see a piece that is intended to sway those who are open and willing to take a common-sense approach rather than those who are critical.

所有跟贴:

可以狗一下“方舟子抄袭”，看看出来的内容有没有。 :-) - whatistruth (126 bytes) 2012-02-08, 14:18:22 (646466)
- 要是有篇来龙去脉的短文，外人一看就会觉得是方黑的下做 - 猎人 (543 bytes) 2012-02-08, 14:56:45 (646489)
  - 只能说正常思考能力的人会理解吧。可能有被迫害症 - whatistruth (157 bytes) 2012-02-08, 16:01:45 (646506)
Facts were never in dispute in this case - eddie (72 bytes) 2012-02-08, 12:02:17 (646449)
- Then spread the facts not the opinions/interpretations (无内容) - 猎人 (0 bytes) 2012-02-08, 12:09:14 (646451)

加跟贴