看在你所声称的“对新语丝与方先生的尊重”的面子上,最后点拨你一次
“棒棒儿”在你博客上留言抱怨我只“选了两个句子就想定义藐视法罪,无疑是直奔自己的结论而去的”,我这里再就他所看重并引用的以下评论,最后问你几个二选一问题:
在Arundathi Roy案例中,该文说道:“若未经证实,所有公民不得假借公平批评托词对庭审法官的行为进行评论,这些(不适合评论)将破坏制度本身。” (All the citizens could not be permitted to comment upon the conduct of courts in the name of fair criticism which, if not checked, would destroy the institution itself.)和“当诉讼程序悬而未决,有人进行言辞恶劣的攻击时…这些言行不是针对某个法官的行为,而是对制度进行直接的攻击,” “When a scurrilous attack is made in relation to a pending proceeding and the noticee states that the issuance of notice was intended to silence criticism and muzzle dissent, to harass and intimidate those who disagree with it, it is a direct attack on the institution itself, rather than the conduct of an individual judge,'’
你认为《公开信》指责武汉法院判决“罔顾事实、偏袒一方、指鹿为马、颠倒是非,从而破坏了法律的尊严”等,属于“未经证实”还是基于事实(你可以去查一下当时对判决书的具体评论文章指出的事实)?你认为这是“假借公平批评托词对庭审法官的行为进行评论”、“言辞恶劣的攻击”吗?你认为公开信是“对制度进行直接的攻击”、“将破坏制度”还是能够完善中国的法治、学术制度?
提醒一下,据说“精品法官”被调离了审判岗位,抽去抓法O功去了,多个后续相关案子也不了了之了:
http://www.xys.org/forum/db/2/147/45.htmlhttp://www.xys.org/forum/db/2/147/128.html