如果选了最佳的，那么次佳的收益是机会成本。但如果选了次佳的，

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Enlighten 于 2008-04-23, 21:46:04:

回答: 哪位能帮我解释一下寻正的“机会成本”？由 eng 于 2008-04-23, 21:29:52:

那么最佳和次佳的差就是机会成本。(因为有不确定性所以乘上概率)。

他指的是从航空公司角度，卖全价是最佳，卖低价是次佳。

所有跟贴:

correction - Enlighten (311 bytes) 2008-04-23, 21:51:37 (220886)
- 他说的可是“你买低价票的机率” - eng (50 bytes) 2008-04-23, 22:06:02 (220904)
  - the reference point is full-price - Enlighten (152 bytes) 2008-04-23, 22:12:36 (220910)
    - I can see what you mean but this computation doesn't make sense - eng (424 bytes) 2008-04-23, 22:32:37 (220922)
      - the opportunity loss happens only in the following scenario: - Enlighten (496 bytes) 2008-04-23, 22:42:00 (220926)
        
        你的书背得真好。可惜不管用。 - james_hussein_bond (276 bytes) 2008-04-23, 22:49:34 (220927)
        
        last time you claimed Nobel prize was BS too. - Enlighten (213 bytes) 2008-04-23, 22:56:30 (220928)
        
        You got it backwards. If the guy doesn't get the discount, he doesn't fly. - james_hussein_bond (47 bytes) 2008-04-23, 23:00:03 (220930)
        
        if all seats were sold, of course there's not opportunity loss. - Enlighten (168 bytes) 2008-04-23, 23:04:33 (220931)
        
        False premise - james_hussein_bond (337 bytes) 2008-04-24, 06:38:44 (220947)
        
        you mixed up two types of consumers. - Enlighten (397 bytes) 2008-04-23, 23:15:10 (220935)
        
        Gosh, you're slow. - james_hussein_bond (154 bytes) 2008-04-23, 23:10:36 (220933)
- 寻正文章里的应该叫机会损失，而不是机会成本。 (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2008-04-23, 21:57:03 (220893)

加跟贴