送交者: Enlighten 于 2007-05-03, 12:11:57:

回答: Wood, 那些研究里的遗传率不是狭义的Mandelian遗传率 由 Enlighten 于 2007-05-03, 11:59:59:

• 为什么很多不学生物的人在生物问题上都自我感觉这么良好呢？ - 方舟子 (14 bytes) 2007-05-03, 23:55:07 (138882)
• 避免打击面太广特此声明：生物的糊涂虫多但不排除有明白的:) (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:56:52 (138839)
• 那个糊涂虫付新员也是学生物的 (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:53:49 (138838)
• 还是斑竹明智--在生物还没有把脑子全部毁坏时就出来了:) (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:47:38 (138835)
• 再给学生物的普及一下孪生实验的limitations - Enlighten (344 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:21:44 (138829)
  • how do you know the difference is not a result of that in genes? (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:44:29 (138833)
    • I don't know. But the burden of proof lies with the researcher - Enlighten (73 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:49:57 (138837)
      • this is not a matter of "burden of prooof" - eng (351 bytes) 2007-05-03, 16:44:23 (138858)
  • Hunhun, the non-biologist, said it well - Enlighten (111 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:28:21 (138831)
    • Banzhu said that we should not trust Hunhun. (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 14:40:49 (138847)

加跟贴