Wood, 那些研究里的遗传率不是狭义的Mandelian遗传率

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: Enlighten 于 2007-05-03, 11:59:59:

I've said it VERY VERY clearly:

（我这里说的遗传率是指Hammond研究里用统计算出的那种遗传率。）

所有跟贴:

What so ever ... sounds a bit strange anyway (无内容) - Wood (0 bytes) 2007-05-04, 05:06:28 (138886)
为什么很多学生物的思维都不清楚？ (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:11:57 (138826)
- 为什么很多不学生物的人在生物问题上都自我感觉这么良好呢？ - 方舟子 (14 bytes) 2007-05-03, 23:55:07 (138882)
- 避免打击面太广特此声明：生物的糊涂虫多但不排除有明白的:) (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:56:52 (138839)
- 那个糊涂虫付新员也是学生物的 (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:53:49 (138838)
- 还是斑竹明智--在生物还没有把脑子全部毁坏时就出来了:) (无内容) - Enlighten (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:47:38 (138835)
- 再给学生物的普及一下孪生实验的limitations - Enlighten (344 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:21:44 (138829)
  - how do you know the difference is not a result of that in genes? (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:44:29 (138833)
    - I don't know. But the burden of proof lies with the researcher - Enlighten (73 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:49:57 (138837)
      - this is not a matter of "burden of prooof" - eng (351 bytes) 2007-05-03, 16:44:23 (138858)
  - Hunhun, the non-biologist, said it well - Enlighten (111 bytes) 2007-05-03, 12:28:21 (138831)
    - Banzhu said that we should not trust Hunhun. (无内容) - Latino2 (0 bytes) 2007-05-03, 14:40:49 (138847)

加跟贴