真奇怪,统计相关性跟因果性是两码事,后者是前者的特殊情况
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: xinku 于 2007-04-30, 16:46:47:
这有什么好质疑的?怎么会有人连这都搞不明白?
所有跟贴:
A causes B = A and B 统计相关 + A happens before B all the time (无内容)
-
008
(0 bytes)
2007-04-30, 18:52:03
(138299)
No. What you said is only granger causality. (无内容)
-
mangolasi
(0 bytes)
2007-05-01, 07:02:35
(138324)
也不一定。有时第三者是因:C-->A,C-->B (无内容)
-
Enlighten
(0 bytes)
2007-04-30, 19:35:04
(138301)
A has to happen before B. In that case, how do you know it is not A-->B (无内容)
-
008
(0 bytes)
2007-04-30, 20:19:44
(138305)
who said 统计相关性跟因果性are not两码事?
-
zzzz2008
(370 bytes)
2007-04-30, 17:18:40
(138283)
统计相关性 is not 因果性 by definition
-
xinku
(395 bytes)
2007-04-30, 17:28:53
(138285)
I agree with you.
-
zzzz2008
(212 bytes)
2007-04-30, 17:38:32
(138286)
笑翻我也,真是秀才遇到兵,有理说不清
-
孤行
(118 bytes)
2007-04-30, 18:17:09
(138292)
there is still something else here
-
xinku
(485 bytes)
2007-04-30, 17:48:41
(138287)
I have to disagree a little bit.
-
zzzz2008
(1140 bytes)
2007-04-30, 18:16:50
(138291)
您的思维逻辑和讨论风格真是让人绝倒啊 (无内容)
-
孤行
(0 bytes)
2007-04-30, 18:19:38
(138293)
Personal attacking doesn't prove anything.
-
zzzz2008
(22 bytes)
2007-04-30, 18:33:52
(138295)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)