这种只会随大流跟风的庸人，最适合当力薄儒

送交者: qm 于 2017-03-30, 22:58:54:

回答: 这种自以为比绝大多数科学家都懂气候都懂科学的妄人，其实和邪教徒一样，难怪会当川粉由方舟子于 2017-03-30, 22:17:43:

When was science ever decided by 绝大多数?

Can you define "global temperature"? Why the earth has been warming since the last ice age well before industrialization? Do 绝大多数 climatologists have any track record of predicting climate beyond, say, 20 years?

Of course, 这种只会随大流跟风的 liberal can never and will never think about those questions. I feel sorry for you.

所有跟贴:

无视研究证据，活在自己的世界，一切以自己的判断为判断，还要说没有共识， - 明本如是 (47 bytes) 2017-03-31, 19:38:47 (829642)
this exactly what climate deniers are - they don't understand climate change - newcomer36 (635 bytes) 2017-03-31, 13:13:29 (829604)
Then can you define anything? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:57:06 (829589)
- Whatever I do in science is well defined (无内容) - qm (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:05:45 (829595)
  - Enlighten us (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 16:21:56 (829612)
科学的事情还是跟大流的好 - LB (158 bytes) 2017-03-31, 08:55:39 (829576)
- 没错, 关键不是随不随大流,而是外行别胡搅瞎搀和 (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:58:13 (829590)
- Not if 大流 has conflict of interest - qm (205 bytes) 2017-03-31, 09:41:36 (829579)
  - Have problems for funding anyway? - 明本如是 (252 bytes) 2017-03-31, 19:49:48 (829643)
  - That's called conspiracy theory. China is and the rest of the world - silxirt (19 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:18 (829591)
    - Conspiracy or not, conflict of interest is real - qm (144 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:02:57 (829594)
      - Most scientists are not into it. Funding need is not the driven force - silxirt (435 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:17:35 (829597)
  - Anti-GW has even bigger COI, that's the reason for all the opposition (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:24:20 (829581)
    - So both sides need to shut up - qm (57 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:44:16 (829585)
      - Shut up before or after EPA is killed? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:47 (829592)
      - You're wrong. Researchers have no conflict of interest - ASH (252 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:54:06 (829586)
        
        You are wrong, researchers are people, has opinions so their paper is BS - silxirt (44 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:10:38 (829596)
        
        Their papers are opinions with COI - qm (471 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:20:19 (829598)
        
        Ever wonder why tech (products) based on BS research paper actually work? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 16:23:26 (829613)
        
        Now I know you have at least pursued a Ph.D, LOL. (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:31:25 (829601)
        
        global surface temperature is well-defined, what's your beef? (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:30:18 (829600)
        
        I doubt if you are a researcher - qm (184 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:51 (829593)
        
        I have applied and obtained plenty of grants - ASH (367 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:26:45 (829599)
    - I have no COI on this issue whatsoever (无内容) - qm (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:40:19 (829583)
The fact that you're ignorant about define "global temperature" - ASH (45 bytes) 2017-03-31, 08:48:03 (829574)
- So you know the definition? - qm (11 bytes) 2017-03-31, 09:37:20 (829578)
  - I'm not an expert, neither were you, so shut up and listen to the experts - ASH (36 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:26:42 (829582)
    - When you can't define global temperature, it is you who needs to shut up - qm (134 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:42:47 (829584)
      - You mean: that includes everyone. Shut up science? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:54:11 (829603)
气候变暖科不科学不由绝大多数科学家决定，难道由你家主子来决定？整个就一科妄 - 方舟子 (38 bytes) 2017-03-31, 00:27:04 (829564)
- You can't answer the scientific questions. That's exactly 反科学 - qm (216 bytes) 2017-03-31, 09:35:58 (829577)
冒险赞一个 (无内容) - 中土人士 (0 bytes) 2017-03-30, 23:20:20 (829561)

加跟贴