Anti-GW has even bigger COI, that's the reason for all the opposition

送交者: ASH 于 2017-03-31, 10:24:20:

回答: Not if 大流 has conflict of interest 由 qm 于 2017-03-31, 09:41:36:

So both sides need to shut up - qm (57 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:44:16 (829585)
- Shut up before or after EPA is killed? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:47 (829592)
- You're wrong. Researchers have no conflict of interest - ASH (252 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:54:06 (829586)
  - You are wrong, researchers are people, has opinions so their paper is BS - silxirt (44 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:10:38 (829596)
    - Their papers are opinions with COI - qm (471 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:20:19 (829598)
      - Ever wonder why tech (products) based on BS research paper actually work? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 16:23:26 (829613)
      - Now I know you have at least pursued a Ph.D, LOL. (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:31:25 (829601)
      - global surface temperature is well-defined, what's your beef? (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:30:18 (829600)
  - I doubt if you are a researcher - qm (184 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:51 (829593)
    - I have applied and obtained plenty of grants - ASH (367 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:26:45 (829599)
I have no COI on this issue whatsoever (无内容) - qm (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:40:19 (829583)