送交者: 方舟子 于 2017-03-30, 22:17:43:

回答: Face it. Global warming is a religion. 由 qm 于 2017-03-30, 16:05:11:

• 这种只会随大流跟风的庸人，最适合当力薄儒 - qm (396 bytes) 2017-03-30, 22:58:54 (829557)
  • 无视研究证据，活在自己的世界，一切以自己的判断为判断，还要说没有共识， - 明本如是 (47 bytes) 2017-03-31, 19:38:47 (829642)
  • this exactly what climate deniers are - they don't understand climate change - newcomer36 (635 bytes) 2017-03-31, 13:13:29 (829604)
  • Then can you define anything? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:57:06 (829589)
    • Whatever I do in science is well defined (无内容) - qm (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:05:45 (829595)
      • Enlighten us (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 16:21:56 (829612)
  • 科学的事情还是跟大流的好 - LB (158 bytes) 2017-03-31, 08:55:39 (829576)
    • 没错, 关键不是随不随大流,而是外行别胡搅瞎搀和 (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:58:13 (829590)
    • Not if 大流 has conflict of interest - qm (205 bytes) 2017-03-31, 09:41:36 (829579)
      • Have problems for funding anyway? - 明本如是 (252 bytes) 2017-03-31, 19:49:48 (829643)
      • That's called conspiracy theory. China is and the rest of the world - silxirt (19 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:18 (829591)
        • Conspiracy or not, conflict of interest is real - qm (144 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:02:57 (829594)
          • Most scientists are not into it. Funding need is not the driven force - silxirt (435 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:17:35 (829597)
      • Anti-GW has even bigger COI, that's the reason for all the opposition (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:24:20 (829581)
        • So both sides need to shut up - qm (57 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:44:16 (829585)
          • Shut up before or after EPA is killed? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:47 (829592)
          • You're wrong. Researchers have no conflict of interest - ASH (252 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:54:06 (829586)
            • You are wrong, researchers are people, has opinions so their paper is BS - silxirt (44 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:10:38 (829596)
              • Their papers are opinions with COI - qm (471 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:20:19 (829598)
                • Ever wonder why tech (products) based on BS research paper actually work? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 16:23:26 (829613)
                • Now I know you have at least pursued a Ph.D, LOL. (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:31:25 (829601)
                • global surface temperature is well-defined, what's your beef? (无内容) - ASH (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:30:18 (829600)
            • I doubt if you are a researcher - qm (184 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:59:51 (829593)
              • I have applied and obtained plenty of grants - ASH (367 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:26:45 (829599)
        • I have no COI on this issue whatsoever (无内容) - qm (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:40:19 (829583)
  • The fact that you're ignorant about define "global temperature" - ASH (45 bytes) 2017-03-31, 08:48:03 (829574)
    • So you know the definition? - qm (11 bytes) 2017-03-31, 09:37:20 (829578)
      • I'm not an expert, neither were you, so shut up and listen to the experts - ASH (36 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:26:42 (829582)
        • When you can't define global temperature, it is you who needs to shut up - qm (134 bytes) 2017-03-31, 10:42:47 (829584)
          • You mean: that includes everyone. Shut up science? (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2017-03-31, 11:54:11 (829603)
  • 气候变暖科不科学不由绝大多数科学家决定，难道由你家主子来决定？整个就一科妄 - 方舟子 (38 bytes) 2017-03-31, 00:27:04 (829564)
    • You can't answer the scientific questions. That's exactly 反科学 - qm (216 bytes) 2017-03-31, 09:35:58 (829577)
  • 冒险赞一个 (无内容) - 中土人士 (0 bytes) 2017-03-30, 23:20:20 (829561)

加跟贴