only HunHunSheng got the point



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: 008 于 2006-4-27, 14:20:47:

回答: Re:人也不是理性的动物 由 mangolasi 于 2006-4-27, 10:51:27:

How the hell do we know morning three evening four is exactly equivalent to morning four evvening three? All those "calculations" are just bushshit, especially those with fancy names such as "LP" or "DP"s. I bet they never worked outside the economists' lab, if they have a lab at all.The only trustable way to judge the value is the monkey's emotion. What makes the monkeys happier is the best choise. Monkey's got no banks and they aren't care about delays.

The gambling experiment in Zhouzi's article is flawed, because the brain damaged people are so stupid to trust the odds that he dealer told them. People with a complete brain will trust their emotion and do the real correct choise: trust the experience instead of the dealer's words. The brain damaged's victory in the experiment only proved that the guy who designed the experiment has an obviously damaged brain.

Let's keep hunhun's words in mind 汝非猴,安知猴之乐?





所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl