只是Yau集团的人还想给Yau的老朋友Hamilton多分点credit罢了.
曹朱修改了其文章,题目也改了,在Introduction里面说"we have changed the title and modified the abstract in order to better reflect our view that the full credit of proving the Poincare's conjecture goes to
Hamilton and Perelman", "While the results presented here are based on the accumulated works of many geometric analysts, the complete proof of the Poincar´e conjecture is due to Hamilton and Perelman."
(http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/0612/0612069.pdf)
早知如此,何必当初.如果他们象MORGAN-田刚一样诚实做人,老老实实承认自己只是做解释工作,不能分享CREDIT,怎么会有这样的尴尬和难堪(先不说他们涉嫌抄袭).而且,他们现在也还应该学习MORGAN-田刚,MORGAN-田刚认为应该把主要功劳归于佩雷尔曼,这是更合理的看法.
至此,由丘成桐这位数学界的泰森发起的一场企图破坏数学界的诚实和公正的闹剧,也基本结束.丘成桐和田刚这对师徒高下已分,丘的学术水平更高,但道德低下,远逊于田.
在中国年青一代的数学家里,田刚从学术到人品,都是No.1. (林芳华的学问不错,人品不行)