送交者: HunHunSheng 于 2006-12-07, 14:28:26:

回答: It does not matter. Tian is only responsible for his employer 由 HunHunSheng 于 2006-12-07, 14:26:01:

• 目的之一 - Nixrreg (744 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:54:37 (114780)
  • 即使自己是个什么. 反正早晚都要死干吗. 把这个看那么重 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:04:32 (114781)
• But if the employer is suspected to have some illegal activities - xinku (85 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:38:04 (114774)
  • Any laws says Beida can not pay her employee 10 months's salary - HunHunSheng (83 bytes) 2006-12-07, 14:47:54 (114777)
    • 你又开始胡缠了,人家不是长江特聘么 - Kurt (60 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:43:55 (114797)
    • 我国宪法规定 - xinku (56 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:10:28 (114784)
      • 这个案子跟宪法无关 - Nixrreg (189 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:35:35 (114794)
      • 这个由雇主掌握 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:13:54 (114787)
        • 那是米国，在中国是全国人大才有权解释宪法 (无内容) - At@ (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 17:01:01 (114813)
        • In china, it is up to the lawmaker, namely National People's Congress, - steven (80 bytes) 2006-12-07, 16:17:41 (114807)
        • Employer has the right to determine its employee's worth (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:32:22 (114790)
        • 雇主也没权利解释宪法。只有最高法院才有这个权。 - xinku (14 bytes) 2006-12-07, 15:16:48 (114789)

加跟贴