补充:没来做3年检查的是两个“re-routing was not successful”的做过宫内手术的患者


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 羽矢 于 2011-07-18, 14:18:27:

回答: 斑竹:麻烦请给发到新到资料:Peters的3年报告造假 由 猎人 于 2011-07-18, 09:34:11:

属于完全失败,恐怕不是lost to follow-up,而是有可能被“劝退”。

1年论文:9名患者术前MCC:252 200 165 200 48 350 226 189 269
3年结果:7名患http://www.xys.org/bbcode.html者术前MCC:均值210、中值200

经计算,缺了的患者只能是#2(或#3,都是200cc)、#7号。去掉这两人后,均值210.4、中值200。如果去掉其他人,则最接近210的均值为208.3或211.7

另外,这3名做过宫内手术的并非re-routing was not successful,而是反射弧都曾经建立了,在1年论文中算作“成功”。那个37岁患者也是这样。

幻灯:
2 subjects not returning considered non-responders
3-year Bladder MCC and NDO (n=7)
[] Baseline MCC: Mean=210 cc; Median=200 cc

海报:
At 3 years, 2 patients did not return for follow-up and were considered non-responders. Seven patients returned for 36-month evaluation. On UDT, maximum cystometric capacity improved from mean 210 cc to 293 cc.

两年结果新闻:
[url]http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/Modern+Medicine+Now/Sacral-nerve-re-routing-possible-in-spina-bifida-p/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/698880[/url]
The multicenter study will exclude children who had undergone intrauterine closure of their myelomeningocele because the two children in the pilot study in whom the re-routing was not successful were among three children with this history.




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明