Fair. it is preventive! no doubt.

送交者: 猎人于 2012-01-14, 07:10:51:

回答: the analogy 由 cornbug 于 2012-01-13, 23:03:18:

Can you repeat the procedure to boost its claimed effect when its effect starts to wean off?

Do you have long term data in your prelim study (longer than a year)?

Clinical significance depends on: the impact of the condition on people's life, risk of procedure, cost, long term effect, the availability of alternative ect. The bottomline is: given what you know about the procedure (above), would people do it? This can be done with a questionare when you have the above info.

所有跟贴:

Are you sure it is preventive? - cornbug (345 bytes) 2012-01-14, 07:36:08 (641354)
- Prevention may not be accurate. - 猎人 (2681 bytes) 2012-01-14, 09:43:11 (641359)
  - I like to use the occurrence as a primary measure - cornbug (507 bytes) 2012-01-14, 11:13:19 (641371)
    - you are welcome! - 猎人 (992 bytes) 2012-01-14, 12:32:57 (641383)
      - Not finished yet :) - cornbug (304 bytes) 2012-01-14, 14:37:21 (641392)
        
        Your goal is to prove your claim is TRUE. - 猎人 (505 bytes) 2012-01-14, 20:50:55 (641421)
        
        Thanks. The goal is apparent. (无内容) - cornbug (0 bytes) 2012-01-14, 21:45:51 (641427)

加跟贴