回eddie：

送交者: 猎人于 2011-10-28, 05:20:46:

回答: (人）的社会行为总是在（职业）道德，规章，法律的层次上受到制约由猎人于 2011-10-27, 21:26:17:

我的意思是：
1，最大程度的达到fairness
2, 我不支持仅仅是为限制自由的规章法规。
3，银行等反对规章法律就等于在说"相信他们f会fair"，但这种口号卖不出去，所以才打出"自由市场"的旗子。视法律规章为束缚的人就是想干不fair的事情。
4，道德层面的制约是相信人有羞耻感，做事会fair,规章和法律是给缺德人设的不同层面的底线而已.

所有跟贴:

Fairness is always subjective - eddie (402 bytes) 2011-10-28, 08:48:01 (625668)
- 你的例子说明的是政府该如何介入不是该不该介入。 - 猎人 (901 bytes) 2011-10-28, 10:46:36 (625685)
  - It's about the freedom of choice - eddie (494 bytes) 2011-10-28, 11:00:43 (625688)
    - "Freedom of Choice" is just too empty to have any meaning. - 猎人 (541 bytes) 2011-10-28, 11:26:39 (625699)
      - I gave you many examples - eddie (129 bytes) 2011-10-28, 11:47:21 (625703)
        
        how many people do not have coverage by choice? - 猎人 (61 bytes) 2011-10-28, 14:27:25 (625726)
        
        Your example of abortion coverage is not a good one - ASH (487 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:10:28 (625706)
        
        Here is another example - eddie (298 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:32:51 (625710)
        
        This is another bad example - ASH (293 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:49:32 (625713)
        
        how can you assume that he would run out of money? - eddie (82 bytes) 2011-10-28, 13:01:28 (625714)
        
        that was exactly the point - eddie (344 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:30:15 (625709)
        
        We got no choice either. There is just one that covers abortion. - ASH (536 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:44:48 (625712)
        
        when you got no choice in the market place - eddie (194 bytes) 2011-10-28, 13:03:03 (625715)

加跟贴