"Freedom of Choice" is just too empty to have any meaning.

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 猎人于 2011-10-28, 11:26:39:

回答: It's about the freedom of choice 由 eddie 于 2011-10-28, 11:00:43:

A lot of times, people just don't have choices, where is the freedom?

I am not defending any platform, liberal or conservative.

My simple point is " the government should have a role, and free market is not free."

As to details of approaches, I am not with any party.

I'd like to think positive as to what should be done or right.

As to fairness to everyone, is still back to the similar point I raised: the question is how we can make it fair to everyone, NOT whether we should pursue fairness at all.

所有跟贴:

I gave you many examples - eddie (129 bytes) 2011-10-28, 11:47:21 (625703)
- how many people do not have coverage by choice? - 猎人 (61 bytes) 2011-10-28, 14:27:25 (625726)
- Your example of abortion coverage is not a good one - ASH (487 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:10:28 (625706)
  - Here is another example - eddie (298 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:32:51 (625710)
    - This is another bad example - ASH (293 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:49:32 (625713)
      - how can you assume that he would run out of money? - eddie (82 bytes) 2011-10-28, 13:01:28 (625714)
  - that was exactly the point - eddie (344 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:30:15 (625709)
    - We got no choice either. There is just one that covers abortion. - ASH (536 bytes) 2011-10-28, 12:44:48 (625712)
      - when you got no choice in the market place - eddie (194 bytes) 2011-10-28, 13:03:03 (625715)

加跟贴