这个地方是不是跟指出“standard of care”那样直接点明:


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 羽矢 于 2010-09-26, 15:20:02:

回答: 准备给Beaumont再送一信 由 eddie 于 2010-09-26, 14:50:46:

引用:
Has your hospital verified any data provided by Dr. Xiao Chuanguo himself on his procedure

他们的Project Information:

引用:
http://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=7696321
The end result is the creation of a new reflex where the bladder can be emptied by scratching or stimulating the skin supplied by that spinal nerve root. He has reported that in 92 SCI patients, 88% regained bladder control within one year after the nerve rerouting surgery and in 110 children with spina bifida, reported success in 87% at one year.

前面对Dr. Kass提的问题:

引用:
As a member of Beaumont team who have conducted the preliminary trial and obtained the NIH fund for the Xiao Procedure, anyone of your team has ever read this conference report that claims more than 85% success rate on which your trials are mainly based:

Xiao CG. A somatic-autonomic reflex pathway procedure for neurogenic bladder and bowel: results on 92 patients with SCI and 110 children with spina bifida. . In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Urology; Shanghai, July 2-4, Shanghai, China; 2005.

Hint: this important conference report is in fact non-existent in the literature:
http://xysblogs.org/wp-content/blogs/107/uploads/xpletter.html#nt2

另外,这句话里的innovators是指肖传国这个发明者还是也包括了Peters et al?

引用:
Unless the innovators provide a sound argument and data for the validity of the procedure, there is a great danger of its improper and rapid adaptation by patients and the medical community at large.

如果指发明者肖传国等,上面这句话可以全引,跟“Has your hospital verified any data”呼应一下,“Dr. Xiao Chuanguo, the pioneer of the procedure”也改成innovator。



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明