送交者: steven 于 2005-3-24, 14:23:02:
回答: 新到中关于钱学长的评价 由 conner 于 2005-3-24, 12:19:45:
bad science. I didn't read the origianl "official" scientific paper. As I record, those opinions were quote from newspaper. Disregard the polictical enviornment at that time, Qian's opinions might be a product of casual talks with reporters. He might not have been very careful about his words, or even his calculation. Those opinions were definitly not a serious work intented to submit for peer review. I don't think we should be to serious about it. After all, everyone, practically, knows those opinions are wrong.