"——人口数量是渐变而不是突变"? for a city, this is not necessary the case.

"——人口数量是渐变而不是突变"? for a city, this is not necessary the case.

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: steven 于 2009-08-26, 17:46:59:

回答: 这种文章为什么写得再长也是民科—— 由 Amsel 于 2009-08-26, 15:47:46:

People may move in and out of a city, and the fluctuation can be drastically comparing to natural growth.

Even for a city you cannot predict any drastic population change 10 years ahead - Amsel (55 bytes) 2009-08-26, 18:00:53 (359871)
- fair enough. I was pointing out that the city population growth - steven (17 bytes) 2009-08-26, 18:05:49 (359874)
Obviously we meant national population. (无内容) - Amsel (0 bytes) 2009-08-26, 17:52:05 (359867)
- but the city population growth is the dominant factor of housing market. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2009-08-26, 18:00:09 (359870)
  - come on, You said "People may move in and out of a city" - Amsel (191 bytes) 2009-08-26, 18:07:38 (359876)