送交者: 方舟子 于 2005-2-24, 15:36:13:

回答: 中青报的这个文科傻妞的尾巴到底是怎么被踩到了？ 由 gopher 于 2005-2-24, 13:28:55:

见：

答《中国青年报》记者刘县书的批评
http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/bingdian/liuxianshu.txt

刘县书是如何断章取义、筛选事实的
http://www.xys.org/xys/netters/Fang-Zhouzi/bingdian/liuxianshu2.txt

• May I ask a question? - bluesky007 (205 bytes) 2005-2-24, 15:57:02
  • Idiots are still idiots, no matter how many books are read - 008 (166 bytes) 2005-2-25, 02:13:33
    • Re - bluesky007 (276 bytes) 2005-2-25, 16:52:01
      • You sure you understand QED? - wasguru (918 bytes) 2005-2-25, 21:13:11
        • Re - bluesky007 (78 bytes) 2005-2-26, 13:22:20
  • If you start throwing around the word "QED" - michiko (52 bytes) 2005-2-24, 16:44:27
  • 我为什么需要去读一本科普读物才能写文章？ - 方舟子 (92 bytes) 2005-2-24, 16:25:32
    • HaHaHa, QED科普读物 - qhhh4 (0 bytes) 2005-2-25, 01:12:24
      • 对你这种不读书的白痴当然是太高深了 - michiko (114 bytes) 2005-2-25, 01:49:36
    • OK, if you have read the academic papers about th quantum theory of light - bluesky007 (238 bytes) 2005-2-24, 18:32:21
    • Feyman's lectures are not 科普读物! - bluesky007 (78 bytes) 2005-2-24, 16:46:05
      • Huh? You sure which book the WKSN referenced? - michiko (141 bytes) 2005-2-24, 16:55:32

加跟贴