Plos One 编辑方针独特,重看技术,说以不会太好


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: ASH 于 2008-12-22, 15:53:18:

回答: PLOS ONE还没分。不过PLOS系列也不会太差。 由 xinlihuaxys 于 2008-12-22, 14:46:09:

Each submission is assigned to a member of the PLoS ONE Editorial Board. They are responsible for managing the peer review for each submission - a process which concentrates on technical rather than subjective concerns and may involve discussion with other members of the Editorial Board and/or the solicitation of the opinions of other experts in the field.

俺的初步感觉与trus类似,邓的文章总的讲档次不高,除了那篇AJHG以外。用Genome-wide association搞QTL太容易出假阳性了,绝大部分发在低档次杂志上的文章都是些噪音。弄出个基因来,得到别人的独立验证才是硬货。

当然这些文章给老邓带来实际好处,还是很受用的。




所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明