Each submission is assigned to a member of the PLoS ONE Editorial Board. They are responsible for managing the peer review for each submission -
a process which concentrates on technical rather than subjective concerns and may involve discussion with other members of the Editorial Board and/or the solicitation of the opinions of other experts in the field.
俺的初步感觉与trus类似,邓的文章总的讲档次不高,除了那篇AJHG以外。用Genome-wide association搞QTL太容易出假阳性了,绝大部分发在低档次杂志上的文章都是些噪音。弄出个基因来,得到别人的独立验证才是硬货。
当然这些文章给老邓带来实际好处,还是很受用的。