Then if a 8-month fetus threatening the life of the mother?



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: mangolasi 于 2005-2-22, 16:57:08:

回答: reasonable. 由 匆匆过客 于 2005-2-22, 16:47:35:

If you accept the priority of the life of the mother over the 8-month fetus, you accept the premise that it's yet a human.

Difficult to be clear defined. Abortion at 9-month is almost infantcide in MY eye. But that's not a baby yet, but the convention of our society. 14 weeks? how about 14 weeks+1 day? why not 14 weeks-1 day? Once you want to draw a clear line, that's approaching to a ban.

I think passive acceptance is reasonable, simply because drawing line is worse. Indeed, I don't think there are many women around enjoy abortion.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl