送交者: 短江学者 于 2008-01-10, 09:06:38:

回答: 我问你的问题你能回答一下吗？ 由 apple 于 2008-01-10, 08:56:39:

• look, I don't like to discuss issues as whether nature is fundamentally - 短江学者 (1327 bytes) 2008-01-10, 09:33:06 (197061)
  • you seem to have forgot quantum mechanics started with matrix representation - 008 (156 bytes) 2008-01-10, 14:26:22 (197117)
  • one thing you have been incorrectly used for all this time, - steven (349 bytes) 2008-01-10, 11:07:04 (197072)
    • analogue voltage is a real number in a continuum say [0,1]. - 短江学者 (247 bytes) 2008-01-10, 11:23:40 (197074)
      • that is not true either. The potential energy at quantum level - steven (567 bytes) 2008-01-10, 11:47:52 (197078)
        • 势能离散？没搞错吧 (无内容) - whoami (0 bytes) 2008-01-10, 12:30:01 (197088)
          • 混淆了吧 - whoami (78 bytes) 2008-01-10, 12:57:38 (197097)
          • have forgotten the first class in quantum physics? Bohr's model? (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-01-10, 12:36:17 (197092)
        • ok. what if,say, part of the brain works according to the Schrodinger equation? - 短江学者 (244 bytes) 2008-01-10, 12:14:31 (197083)
          • well lets say I don't know what I meant either. lets stop here. Thanks. (无内容) - 短江学者 (0 bytes) 2008-01-10, 12:36:45 (197093)
          • is schrodinger equation computable? :) - steven (64 bytes) 2008-01-10, 12:32:25 (197090)
  • As for whether computer can deduce mathematical proof - fuzzify (189 bytes) 2008-01-10, 09:52:40 (197062)
    • I am aware of this very respectable and useful research plan - 短江学者 (34 bytes) 2008-01-10, 10:02:52 (197063)
      • It's been done, but you said "it is possible". (无内容) - fuzzify (0 bytes) 2008-01-10, 10:23:27 (197064)
        • sorry I should have said "all mathematical tricks". There - 短江学者 (138 bytes) 2008-01-10, 10:27:44 (197065)
• 你认为离散“不能帮助我们发现地球轨迹和人脑操作”， - apple (165 bytes) 2008-01-10, 09:21:24 (197059)

加跟贴