一万年前，中国的两河流域长江和黄河独立起源了农业文明，

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: JZ 于 2008-03-03, 11:07:24:

回答: 专家称“四大文明古国”说法不规范中国应出局由 sofar 于 2008-03-03, 10:15:25:

并向周边辐射农业文明，远至西藏，缅甸，印度支那，台湾，直至太平洋诸岛，这是举世公认的。

由此而引起的城帮式的文明，中国也没有落后多少。

所有跟贴:

看这篇Science review paper的插图 - JZ (102 bytes) 2008-03-03, 13:45:43 (209579)
独立起源没错，商榷的是举世公认,周边辐射 - sofar (361 bytes) 2008-03-03, 13:12:15 (209567)
- 周边辐射是主流学界的看法 - JZ (30 bytes) 2008-03-03, 13:27:11 (209571)
  - 看看这个主流的说法，虽然它不一定对 - sofar (216 bytes) 2008-03-03, 13:33:02 (209572)
    - India was not an independent agriculture origin (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 13:40:05 (209575)
      - 我不是说过“中土的社会科学家没有尽到自己的责任”？ - sofar (34 bytes) 2008-03-03, 13:48:28 (209581)
        
        don't even bother mentioning them (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 14:01:13 (209595)
“举世公认”值得商榷 (无内容) - sofar (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:45:55 (209561)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_agriculture - JZ (133 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:58:12 (209565)
问题是对现代文明的贡献几乎为零,而且拒绝接受 (无内容) - micro (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:09:02 (209556)
- 古代文明如何拒绝或不拒绝接受现代文明？ (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:24:17 (209560)
- you are right. but that's irrelevant - we are talking about acient civilization (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:23:25 (209559)
那汉芯算不算举世公认的？ (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:05:40 (209554)
- steven, i am talking about science (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:08:34 (209555)
  - I am not sure if Chinese civilization actually started 10000 years - steven (118 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:15:22 (209557)
    - you are wrong. Agriculture started in Yellow and Yangtze basin 10-8K years ago - JZ (343 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:20:46 (209558)
      - since I don't know, I can't be wrong. As for the impact - steven (194 bytes) 2008-03-03, 12:57:55 (209563)
        
        no. dating of seeds and tools clearly show the gradient (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 13:03:27 (209566)
当然辐射还包括朝鲜半岛和日本诸岛 (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2008-03-03, 11:08:34 (209545)

加跟贴