008 你解释一下电磁炮怎么就成了扯谈了？

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 蓝隼于 2008-02-04, 13:30:21:

人家已经快要装上军舰了这要还是扯谈这扯谈的范围也太宽了。激光剑是扯谈倒还有道理，起码现在没看到它有什么可行的根据(虽然我这么说自己其实很不爽)；电磁炮从理论到实践都很结实的基础你哪里看出问题来了？！

所有跟贴:

你还是先列一下电磁炮相对传统弹药有什么优点吧。 - 008 (71 bytes) 2008-02-04, 14:38:24 (203149)
- Laser's advantage is also its drowback. Light dosn't steer - 蓝隼 (416 bytes) 2008-02-04, 18:35:44 (203182)
- There are significant advantage of railgun comparing to traditional - steven (789 bytes) 2008-02-04, 16:01:59 (203158)
  - Yes, it is a bigger gun than the current Navy guns, but with - 008 (648 bytes) 2008-02-04, 17:13:04 (203165)
    - We didn't use pure kinetic energy weapon at the very begining is because - 蓝隼 (879 bytes) 2008-02-04, 18:28:47 (203180)
    - just for a little background education. The Meteor crater - steven (471 bytes) 2008-02-04, 17:25:00 (203167)
      - come on, the rail gun can only create a 10-foot cratoer - 008 (298 bytes) 2008-02-04, 19:27:17 (203198)
        
        You come on! what matters is the energy being delivered - 蓝隼 (704 bytes) 2008-02-04, 20:03:58 (203206)
        
        I didn't read his post carefully. Yup, it should be a good education for 008. - steven (278 bytes) 2008-02-05, 01:38:41 (203232)
        
        I was telling you that just kinetic energy without explosive is still - steven (197 bytes) 2008-02-04, 20:01:33 (203205)
    - you have no idea. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2008-02-04, 17:13:31 (203166)
  - 现代的军舰还有用大炮的吗？ - deadmeat (90 bytes) 2008-02-04, 16:19:41 (203160)
    - Today, even the artillery are NOLS. XM982 Excalibur, for example, - steven (350 bytes) 2008-02-04, 17:12:45 (203164)

加跟贴