没见他说什么有用的意见。只有两点:


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: james_hussein_bond 于 2008-06-11, 20:37:53:

回答: 斑竹引用的那片Science文章说的就是地震可以预测 由 波一波 于 2008-06-11, 20:30:16:

引用:
The figure in the Perspective by Geller et al. (p. 1617) does not support the idea that earthquakes are unpredictable. It shows, instead, that the sizes of cracks available for failure in earthquakes are fractally distributed. In volumes where no strain energy has been built up by tectonic processes, however, large earthquakes cannot occur, regardless of the nature of the crack distribution. Along the plate margins, where the vast majority of all earthquakes occur, the stresses are likely to be low, and the stress release may be nearly complete (24).

1.不地震是可以预言的!
引用:
I doubt that human curiosity and ingenuity can be prevented in the long run from exploring fully the extent to which at least some earthquakes are predictable, although it is not easy. Such discoveries will be made in Japan, Europe, or China if the current lack of funding for earthquake prediction research continues in the United States.

2.他怕没经费了。



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码: 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容: (BBCode使用说明