送交者: james_hussein_bond 于 2008-05-26, 20:45:40:

回答: why Computer Science is technology? who defines what science is? 由 steven 于 2008-05-26, 20:35:13:

• theoretical computer science does not study computer - xinku (38 bytes) 2008-05-26, 21:15:09 (230407)
  • Strictly speaking, mathematics is not science (无内容) - james_hussein_bond (0 bytes) 2008-05-26, 21:29:04 (230412)
  • Why enlight him? (无内容) - 123xyz (0 bytes) 2008-05-26, 21:18:16 (230408)
• 照你这么说风水也是science (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2008-05-26, 21:00:10 (230404)
  • No. 风水 is man's creation (rather, imagination). (无内容) - james_hussein_bond (0 bytes) 2008-05-26, 21:31:26 (230414)
    • does or does not fengshui study wind and water? (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2008-05-26, 22:09:46 (230428)
      • No. It has nothing to do with "study" (无内容) - james_hussein_bond (0 bytes) 2008-05-27, 06:36:40 (230461)
        • unfortunately then you will need to define what "study" is - eng (68 bytes) 2008-05-27, 08:10:01 (230467)
          • I can define what "study" is not: It's not pseudoscience. - james_hussein_bond (46 bytes) 2008-05-27, 08:37:25 (230472)
            • 典型的循环论证 - eng (54 bytes) 2008-05-27, 09:03:40 (230474)
              • Most of philosophy of science is circular logic. 你难道不知道？ - james_hussein_bond (28 bytes) 2008-05-27, 09:28:18 (230483)
                • I thought you could find a better starting point - eng (121 bytes) 2008-05-27, 10:13:17 (230500)

加跟贴