unfortunately then you will need to define what "study" is

unfortunately then you will need to define what "study" is

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: eng 于 2008-05-27, 08:10:01:

回答: No. It has nothing to do with "study" 由 james_hussein_bond 于 2008-05-27, 06:36:40:

or you could say "I know what study is when I sees one"...

I can define what "study" is not: It's not pseudoscience. - james_hussein_bond (46 bytes) 2008-05-27, 08:37:25 (230472)
- 典型的循环论证 - eng (54 bytes) 2008-05-27, 09:03:40 (230474)
  - Most of philosophy of science is circular logic. 你难道不知道？ - james_hussein_bond (28 bytes) 2008-05-27, 09:28:18 (230483)
    - I thought you could find a better starting point - eng (121 bytes) 2008-05-27, 10:13:17 (230500)