学生打死小偷就是犯罪

送交者: sofar 于 2007-03-20, 08:47:57:

取对方生命的自卫的前提是当事人的生命受到威胁。当小偷被打到无还手之力时，或失去匕首时，这种自卫的前提已失去。有人举例在美国，人们将闯入私宅者击毙是合法的。定罪没那么简单，否则要陪审团律师做甚？这里还有一个很大的区别：小偷是在公共场合被取了性命，不是在私宅。不能类比。
Nobody has right to take other people’s life.

所有跟贴:

1) I agree with you it is a crime for the students to kill the thieves - 008 (731 bytes) 2007-03-20, 12:09:11 (130883)
- 把小偷绑在树上，用桌子砸，用椅子腿抽打，周围有两个宿舍楼的学生旁观。 - 若昔难得 (97 bytes) 2007-03-20, 17:22:44 (130973)
  - That was another case, isn't it? (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2007-03-20, 20:05:12 (130989)
- 6) is about you brother 007--licensed to kill (无内容) - sofar (0 bytes) 2007-03-20, 12:24:08 (130890)
我上大学的时候饭碗老被别的学生偷我真想抓住打死几个 - HunHunSheng (56 bytes) 2007-03-20, 09:09:15 (130829)
- 你长跑就是那时开始练的吧？ - Latino2 (18 bytes) 2007-03-20, 09:50:43 (130837)
  - Around 86, I went to Tsinghua with a tourist group, the food - steven (81 bytes) 2007-03-20, 10:09:29 (130841)
    - You must have not eaten in the 学生食堂 then. Everyone uses - 008 (137 bytes) 2007-03-20, 11:49:17 (130875)
      - I knew it wasn't 学生食堂, since it was pretty nice, and very - steven (52 bytes) 2007-03-20, 12:31:27 (130894)
- 军校也有小偷？ (无内容) - sofar (0 bytes) 2007-03-20, 09:22:20 (130832)
  - 他是讲自食其力的民办小偷 (无内容) - gadfly (0 bytes) 2007-03-20, 09:30:41 (130835)

加跟贴