送交者: polik 于 2007-12-03, 20:00:53:

回答: no encryption. 由 steven 于 2007-12-03, 19:49:21:

• Those data are public accessible anyway. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-12-03, 20:02:14 (189220)
  • "public accessible" data r selective n postprocessed, not raw, complete data. - polik (191 bytes) 2007-12-03, 20:10:47 (189227)
    • only classified data are encrypted. You don't want to overuse encryption - steven (31 bytes) 2007-12-03, 21:38:17 (189254)
      • The NASA raw data must be classfied,otherwise - polik (136 bytes) 2007-12-03, 21:52:02 (189263)
        • Hi, Dr. Griffin, I didn't know you also visit XYS. Thanks for letting - steven (569 bytes) 2007-12-03, 22:37:43 (189277)
          • 我觉得meteorite split的说法不通 - deadmeat (292 bytes) 2007-12-03, 23:14:52 (189288)
            • well, I am getting bored on this, here is something you can do. - steven (315 bytes) 2007-12-04, 01:10:41 (189319)
            • Do you have the coordinate of the Chang'e picture? I want to - steven (49 bytes) 2007-12-04, 00:30:35 (189305)
            • you are right. I was wrong about that. It couldn't have been done by - steven (14 bytes) 2007-12-04, 00:26:15 (189301)
          • thanks a lot, steven. - polik (180 bytes) 2007-12-03, 22:57:59 (189282)
            • 256-bit AES is quit new, first published in 1998, by that time - steven (623 bytes) 2007-12-04, 00:24:45 (189299)
              • it explains a lot. thanks! (无内容) - polik (0 bytes) 2007-12-04, 00:39:10 (189308)
                • there is a paper, about the NASA deep space network architecture. - steven (114 bytes) 2007-12-04, 00:42:03 (189310)

加跟贴