版主新文里关于荧光说的不确
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: whoami 于 2007-11-16, 20:24:32:
“荧光增白剂能吸收波长为300-400纳米的紫外光线,使分子进
入激发态,激发态分子回到能量较低的基态时,多余的能量幅射
出来,发出荧光。在这一过程中能量减少了,发出来的荧光的波
长也变长了,大约是450纳米,。”
“较低的基态”的说法不妥,基态就一个。应当是在回到基态前
先到了某个中间的亚稳态,使得吸收能量的一部分变成了振动即
热能,由于这一损失,发射光波长比入射光长。
所有跟贴:
挑错不是这么挑的。
-
whatistrue
(564 bytes)
2007-11-17, 16:14:25
(183828)
基态是一个重要的物理概念!
-
bluesky007
(69 bytes)
2007-11-17, 22:45:55
(183893)
能量较低的基态
-
feelslikespring
(180 bytes)
2007-11-17, 15:22:10
(183816)
这样的话后面的“能量减少了”就不清楚了。 (无内容)
-
whoami
(0 bytes)
2007-11-17, 15:49:04
(183820)
这刺挑的不好
-
Yush
(476 bytes)
2007-11-17, 12:07:10
(183778)
Thank Yush, 我还真没有认真读过国内学术期刊的学术文章!
-
bluesky007
(120 bytes)
2007-11-17, 23:03:46
(183894)
较低当然是基态和激发态相比
-
eng
(22 bytes)
2007-11-17, 11:03:00
(183763)
what i wante to say is that the energy loss wasn't mensioned clearly (无内容)
-
whoami
(0 bytes)
2007-11-17, 12:29:34
(183784)
He did mention there is energy loss during the process.
-
feelslikespring
(92 bytes)
2007-11-17, 20:10:19
(183874)
基态: 能量最小的状态
-
bluesky007
(42 bytes)
2007-11-17, 08:26:42
(183735)
不会吧?
-
sangdy
(100 bytes)
2007-11-17, 08:33:35
(183738)
文科+外行话
-
bluesky007
(62 bytes)
2007-11-17, 10:19:24
(183752)
惭愧
-
sangdy
(464 bytes)
2007-11-17, 10:53:26
(183756)
激发态和基态的能量进行比较. 没有意义!
-
bluesky007
(34 bytes)
2007-11-17, 22:36:58
(183892)
In physics, it is a big problem!
-
bluesky007
(60 bytes)
2007-11-17, 09:55:04
(183746)
so what is your major then, physics?
-
sangdy
(74 bytes)
2007-11-17, 10:55:48
(183760)
Yes. Thanks! (无内容)
-
bluesky007
(0 bytes)
2007-11-17, 23:10:26
(183895)
"ground state, which has lower energy level" or "ground state with lower energy"
-
JZ
(28 bytes)
2007-11-17, 08:31:14
(183737)
... ground state in lower energy level... (无内容)
-
sangdy
(0 bytes)
2007-11-17, 08:36:42
(183740)
Meaningless to say "ground state, which has lower energy, ..."
-
bluesky007
(276 bytes)
2007-11-17, 10:11:29
(183749)
舟子写的是科普文章,读者并不都知道基态的定义 (无内容)
-
JZ
(0 bytes)
2007-11-17, 10:15:34
(183751)
Whatever you do, you should give the correct information! (无内容)
-
bluesky007
(0 bytes)
2007-11-17, 10:22:16
(183753)
you are definitely right, knod. (无内容)
-
sangdy
(0 bytes)
2007-11-17, 10:57:09
(183761)
好像没什么不妥吧?
-
sangdy
(41 bytes)
2007-11-16, 21:44:44
(183705)
我理解原文不是这意思,而是想说明荧光现象。 (无内容)
-
whoami
(0 bytes)
2007-11-16, 22:14:21
(183714)
你的说法也有错误
-
feelslikespring
(170 bytes)
2007-11-17, 15:32:20
(183818)
Not really
-
whoami
(66 bytes)
2007-11-17, 16:04:29
(183823)
Whatistrue 说的更专业准确一些。
-
feelslikespring
(188 bytes)
2007-11-17, 20:04:21
(183873)
准确地说, 光的吸收和发射与电子从初始态跃迁到终态有关
-
bluesky007
(758 bytes)
2007-11-18, 00:18:04
(183897)
That is right! (无内容)
-
bluesky007
(0 bytes)
2007-11-16, 21:37:59
(183704)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)