送交者: bluesky007 于 2007-11-17, 08:26:42:

回答: 版主新文里关于荧光说的不确 由 whoami 于 2007-11-16, 20:24:32:

• 不会吧？ - sangdy (100 bytes) 2007-11-17, 08:33:35 (183738)
  • 文科＋外行话 - bluesky007 (62 bytes) 2007-11-17, 10:19:24 (183752)
    • 惭愧 - sangdy (464 bytes) 2007-11-17, 10:53:26 (183756)
      • 激发态和基态的能量进行比较. 没有意义! - bluesky007 (34 bytes) 2007-11-17, 22:36:58 (183892)
  • In physics, it is a big problem! - bluesky007 (60 bytes) 2007-11-17, 09:55:04 (183746)
    • so what is your major then, physics? - sangdy (74 bytes) 2007-11-17, 10:55:48 (183760)
      • Yes. Thanks! (无内容) - bluesky007 (0 bytes) 2007-11-17, 23:10:26 (183895)
• "ground state, which has lower energy level" or "ground state with lower energy" - JZ (28 bytes) 2007-11-17, 08:31:14 (183737)
  • ... ground state in lower energy level... (无内容) - sangdy (0 bytes) 2007-11-17, 08:36:42 (183740)
    • Meaningless to say "ground state, which has lower energy, ..." - bluesky007 (276 bytes) 2007-11-17, 10:11:29 (183749)
      • 舟子写的是科普文章，读者并不都知道基态的定义 (无内容) - JZ (0 bytes) 2007-11-17, 10:15:34 (183751)
        • Whatever you do, you should give the correct information! (无内容) - bluesky007 (0 bytes) 2007-11-17, 10:22:16 (183753)
          • you are definitely right, knod. (无内容) - sangdy (0 bytes) 2007-11-17, 10:57:09 (183761)

加跟贴