共军 had done it only one time, and one time only. This is

送交者: steven 于 2007-09-28, 16:27:55:

回答: 应该还是有的，共军解放初的剿匪战都是不对称的由 4U4luC2 于 2007-09-28, 16:16:02:

typical chinese thinking, overly generalized. There all kinds of factors that will impact the outcome of a war. PLA's "success", even if it is all true, it is not repeatable and that doesn't count.

所有跟贴:

共军剿匪战打了很多，胜多负少,东北，西北，湘西，广西云南 - 4U4luC2 (116 bytes) 2007-09-28, 16:42:06 (173832)
- you don't take thing into perspective, and are blinded your position. - steven (1243 bytes) 2007-09-28, 17:34:14 (173852)
  - you mean they did NOT use brute force in Vietnam? - deadmeat (176 bytes) 2007-09-28, 21:19:49 (173909)
    - comparing to Mongolians, Manchurians and even WWII US air raid, - steven (95 bytes) 2007-09-28, 23:37:38 (173933)
  - 西南剿匪时各反共游记队受到国民党通过边境空投，渗透进来的补给 - 4U4luC2 (377 bytes) 2007-09-28, 17:51:51 (173859)
    - you don't even know what asymmetrical warfare means, - steven (24 bytes) 2007-09-28, 18:11:08 (173861)
      - I guess I should not have followed your very first post (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-09-28, 18:30:15 (173867)
    - "国民党空投" If 国民党 had been so effective, it won't lost to 共军. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-09-28, 18:10:15 (173860)
      - 97年你逃离香港时也对女王说过这话？ (无内容) - 阳明 (0 bytes) 2007-09-28, 18:27:22 (173865)
- 美国佬强奸成性／虐俘成瘾／谎话连篇没落的八旗兵 (无内容) - 阳明 (0 bytes) 2007-09-28, 16:55:53 (173836)
OK I may have overly simplfed this very complicated matter - 4U4luC2 (108 bytes) 2007-09-28, 16:34:03 (173828)
- yes, you can expect another Attack on Pearl Harbur will work just like - steven (126 bytes) 2007-09-28, 17:39:18 (173856)

加跟贴