there you go again



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: apate 于 2005-1-17, 15:56:22:

回答: The topic derives from the discussion about 由 Enlighten 于 2005-1-17, 15:52:04:

i could be wrong but lets suppose you are making your "whatever is good for human is good is right" to justify environmental protection. however, this same argument can be used to justify the point of those who argue against environmental protection. if this is the case and if both sides are human beings, then following your logic, there must be some *higher* laws justiying both parties so that *something* is *unanimously* taken to be good for *both* parties and there is right to all them as well.

let me know what that *something* is. thank you.

understood?



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl