送交者: 老中一号 于 2005-6-04, 18:15:27:

回答: Thanks for the reply. 再说说贫富不均的问题。 由 Latino2 于 2005-6-04, 16:58:08:

Even if China has the same degree of concentration of wealth, the sheer number of people amplifies the problem. Is there any "network" effect for such a gigantic population? I honestly don't know, but maintain to suspect that any problems elsewhere when applied to China will take on an entirely different magnitude simply due to the number of people involved.

Simply put, if there are 1,000 people with 100 of them occupying 90% of the wealth, what is the likelihood of a revolution pushing for redistribution of wealth? If there are 10M people with 1M of them claiming 90% of the wealth, what is the likelihood of a revolution? Originally, the "wealthy" class only needs to fight off 900 people to keep the status quo, now the "wealthy" class needs to fight off 9M of them.

所有跟贴:

- 有个承受“域值”问题 -
**Latino2**(372 bytes)*2005-6-04, 18:38:38* - 靠！革命就革命吧，又不是天塌下来。 -
**skipper3**(188 bytes)*2005-6-04, 18:27:40*- 不用革命，每隔几天来个暴动就够受了，资金大逃亡咯 -
**老中一号**(112 bytes)*2005-6-04, 18:35:27*- 那也没什么，钱不管往哪儿讨该是谁的还是谁的，有钱人不会损失什么。 -
**skipper3**(236 bytes)*2005-6-04, 18:45:14*

- 那也没什么，钱不管往哪儿讨该是谁的还是谁的，有钱人不会损失什么。 -

- 不用革命，每隔几天来个暴动就够受了，资金大逃亡咯 -