I call it the "worst possible misery for everyone" argument. A universe in which every conscious creature suffers as much as it possibly can, for as long as it can, is bad, and anything else is better than that, by definition. Given that conscious experience arises based on the laws of nature in some way, movement out of that space is constrained by the laws of nature. There are going to be ways to avoid the worst possible misery for everyone and there are going to be ways to think you're avoiding it and fail.
我把这个观点叫做“对每个人的最坏可能的不幸”。它可以这样解释：宇宙万物中的每个有意识的生物要承受尽可能多的苦难（只要它能承受），这是很不道德的，而其它东西则不会那样。意识经验是基于自然规律产生的，它不能逃脱自然规律的限制。应该有很多方法让每个人避免最坏可能的不幸，也应该有很多方法去思考成功和失败。