"人均基地批" is problematic.



所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl

送交者: mangolasi 于 2006-3-03, 11:25:11:

回答: 什么啊,如果只算中土发达的几各地区(连香港),不管基地批人均基地批还是 由 skipper3 于 2006-3-03, 11:06:14:

Suppose GDP per capita for 50% Chinese is 100 (normalized), GDP per capita for the whole Malaysia is 80. But if GDP per capita for the rest Chinese is 50 (not negative, just simple the difference b/w it and Malaysia is negative). GDP per capita for China is 75<80.

GDP is of course meaningless when we talk about which country is richer. GDP as a whole can just be the indicator of economic influence not afluence, PROVIDED interaction with the rest of the world is equal--how things that happen in this economy propogate to the rest of the world. Can you say Switzerland is poorer than China for several orders of magnitude?

Rich people (Who are they? threshold?) is meaningless either. Other things being equal, a bigger country will get bigger # of superrich. Other things being equal, a more inequal coutnry will get bigger # of super rich. The later is not always pleasant.



所有跟贴:


加跟贴

笔名: 密码(可选项): 注册笔名请按这里

标题:

内容(可选项):

URL(可选项):
URL标题(可选项):
图像(可选项):


所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛http://www.xys.org/cgi-bin/mainpage.pl