为什么试验摧毁卫星,捕获不更好些吗?想抗议也没处找茬
所有跟贴
·
加跟贴
·
新语丝读书论坛
送交者: 4U4luC2 于 2007-01-19, 11:49:33:
所有跟贴:
I think use 大米 to destroy enemy satellite is a good idea
-
skipper3
(414 bytes)
2007-01-19, 14:05:07
(121531)
打仗打仗,杀多少人才是硬道理 (无内容)
-
BTS
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:49:02
(121501)
军事政策定位一上来就用核武器才是杜绝战争维护世界和平的途径 (无内容)
-
HunHunSheng
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:50:33
(121506)
搞到最后国防部长直接拔枪自刭,一劳永逸 (无内容)
-
BTS
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:54:25
(121510)
用原子弹氢弹在外空爆炸能大规模的摧毁卫星么 (无内容)
-
HunHunSheng
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:47:34
(121499)
在低轨道引爆可以扰乱电离层破坏无线电通讯倒是真的。
-
蓝隼
(77 bytes)
2007-01-19, 13:02:33
(121516)
it is true. (无内容)
-
steven
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 13:18:21
(121518)
no, there is no shockwave at outer space, and sat.
-
steven
(54 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:49:58
(121504)
辐射肯定可以毁坏电路,不过干这个就罪大恶极了 (无内容)
-
4U4luC2
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:49:35
(121503)
without nuclear weapon, satellites are still constantly bombarded
-
steven
(123 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:51:47
(121507)
spike and background level protection are two different stories
-
4U4luC2
(17 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:59:59
(121512)
Solar wind is a spike, very big spike, bigger than nuke. (无内容)
-
steven
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 13:01:30
(121515)
摧毁是误打,怪罪旧图;捕获是侵犯,师出无名。不过,
-
笑笑
(273 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:43:08
(121497)
把对方的卫星地面站都干掉就成了。
-
BTS
(64 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:34:35
(121494)
可以以研究回收清理太空垃圾为名,同时也是宣示我能捕获就能摧毁 (无内容)
-
4U4luC2
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 11:55:33
(121478)
china doesn't have the technology.
-
steven
(342 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:02:04
(121480)
不会吧,现在这样打太空台球技术上可比对接或捕获难得多了 (无内容)
-
4U4luC2
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:06:13
(121483)
估计是捕获耗时太多,会给敌方太多反应时间 (无内容)
-
4U4luC2
(0 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:12:49
(121486)
To kill it, you need to move to that orbit, and smash it.
-
steven
(196 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:12:09
(121485)
捕获不一定要重新入轨,废掉就好了
-
4U4luC2
(26 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:20:27
(121489)
对接,捕获可有多次微调和足够时间响应反馈
-
4U4luC2
(51 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:17:56
(121488)
since it is in the orbit, there are many chance for you to hit
-
steven
(65 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:26:10
(121491)
You don't have more than one chance
-
4U4luC2
(127 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:35:01
(121495)
"为什么试验摧毁卫星,捕获不更好些吗?想抗议也没处找茬 "
-
steven
(262 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:47:57
(121500)
thats just what I have said, response time concern
-
4U4luC2
(100 bytes)
2007-01-19, 12:53:43
(121509)
I was responding to your original post, and you follow that post.
-
steven
(116 bytes)
2007-01-19, 13:00:47
(121513)
the post was meant for 唐好色
-
4U4luC2
(45 bytes)
2007-01-20, 11:53:05
(121710)
then don't waste your time reading the posts
-
4U4luC2
(102 bytes)
2007-01-20, 11:50:48
(121709)
sorry wrong post (无内容)
-
4U4luC2
(0 bytes)
2007-01-20, 11:48:42
(121708)
then don't waste your time reading the posts
-
4U4luC2
(99 bytes)
2007-01-20, 11:47:43
(121707)
Steve, I don't think this guy knows what he is talking about.
-
唐好色
(100 bytes)
2007-01-19, 22:35:48
(121660)
加跟贴
笔名:
密码:
注册笔名请按这里
标题:
内容: (
BBCode使用说明
)