为什么试验摧毁卫星，捕获不更好些吗？想抗议也没处找茬

为什么试验摧毁卫星，捕获不更好些吗？想抗议也没处找茬

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 4U4luC2 于 2007-01-19, 11:49:33:

I think use 大米 to destroy enemy satellite is a good idea - skipper3 (414 bytes) 2007-01-19, 14:05:07 (121531)
打仗打仗，杀多少人才是硬道理 (无内容) - BTS (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:49:02 (121501)
- 军事政策定位一上来就用核武器才是杜绝战争维护世界和平的途径 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:50:33 (121506)
  - 搞到最后国防部长直接拔枪自刭，一劳永逸 (无内容) - BTS (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:54:25 (121510)
用原子弹氢弹在外空爆炸能大规模的摧毁卫星么 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:47:34 (121499)
- 在低轨道引爆可以扰乱电离层破坏无线电通讯倒是真的。 - 蓝隼 (77 bytes) 2007-01-19, 13:02:33 (121516)
  - it is true. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 13:18:21 (121518)
- no, there is no shockwave at outer space, and sat. - steven (54 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:49:58 (121504)
- 辐射肯定可以毁坏电路,不过干这个就罪大恶极了 (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:49:35 (121503)
  - without nuclear weapon, satellites are still constantly bombarded - steven (123 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:51:47 (121507)
    - spike and background level protection are two different stories - 4U4luC2 (17 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:59:59 (121512)
      - Solar wind is a spike, very big spike, bigger than nuke. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 13:01:30 (121515)
摧毁是误打，怪罪旧图；捕获是侵犯，师出无名。不过， - 笑笑 (273 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:43:08 (121497)
把对方的卫星地面站都干掉就成了。 - BTS (64 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:34:35 (121494)
可以以研究回收清理太空垃圾为名，同时也是宣示我能捕获就能摧毁 (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 11:55:33 (121478)
- china doesn't have the technology. - steven (342 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:02:04 (121480)
  - 不会吧，现在这样打太空台球技术上可比对接或捕获难得多了 (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:06:13 (121483)
    - 估计是捕获耗时太多，会给敌方太多反应时间 (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:12:49 (121486)
    - To kill it, you need to move to that orbit, and smash it. - steven (196 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:12:09 (121485)
      - 捕获不一定要重新入轨，废掉就好了 - 4U4luC2 (26 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:20:27 (121489)
      - 对接，捕获可有多次微调和足够时间响应反馈 - 4U4luC2 (51 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:17:56 (121488)
        
        since it is in the orbit, there are many chance for you to hit - steven (65 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:26:10 (121491)
        
        You don't have more than one chance - 4U4luC2 (127 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:35:01 (121495)
        
        "为什么试验摧毁卫星，捕获不更好些吗？想抗议也没处找茬 " - steven (262 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:47:57 (121500)
        
        thats just what I have said, response time concern - 4U4luC2 (100 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:53:43 (121509)
        
        I was responding to your original post, and you follow that post. - steven (116 bytes) 2007-01-19, 13:00:47 (121513)
        
        the post was meant for 唐好色 - 4U4luC2 (45 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:53:05 (121710)
        
        then don't waste your time reading the posts - 4U4luC2 (102 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:50:48 (121709)
        
        sorry wrong post (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:48:42 (121708)
        
        then don't waste your time reading the posts - 4U4luC2 (99 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:47:43 (121707)
        
        Steve, I don't think this guy knows what he is talking about. - 唐好色 (100 bytes) 2007-01-19, 22:35:48 (121660)