不会吧，现在这样打太空台球技术上可比对接或捕获难得多了

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: 4U4luC2 于 2007-01-19, 12:06:13:

回答: china doesn't have the technology. 由 steven 于 2007-01-19, 12:02:04:

所有跟贴:

估计是捕获耗时太多，会给敌方太多反应时间 (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:12:49 (121486)
To kill it, you need to move to that orbit, and smash it. - steven (196 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:12:09 (121485)
- 捕获不一定要重新入轨，废掉就好了 - 4U4luC2 (26 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:20:27 (121489)
- 对接，捕获可有多次微调和足够时间响应反馈 - 4U4luC2 (51 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:17:56 (121488)
  - since it is in the orbit, there are many chance for you to hit - steven (65 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:26:10 (121491)
    - You don't have more than one chance - 4U4luC2 (127 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:35:01 (121495)
      - "为什么试验摧毁卫星，捕获不更好些吗？想抗议也没处找茬 " - steven (262 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:47:57 (121500)
        
        thats just what I have said, response time concern - 4U4luC2 (100 bytes) 2007-01-19, 12:53:43 (121509)
        
        I was responding to your original post, and you follow that post. - steven (116 bytes) 2007-01-19, 13:00:47 (121513)
        
        the post was meant for 唐好色 - 4U4luC2 (45 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:53:05 (121710)
        
        then don't waste your time reading the posts - 4U4luC2 (102 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:50:48 (121709)
        
        sorry wrong post (无内容) - 4U4luC2 (0 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:48:42 (121708)
        
        then don't waste your time reading the posts - 4U4luC2 (99 bytes) 2007-01-20, 11:47:43 (121707)
        
        Steve, I don't think this guy knows what he is talking about. - 唐好色 (100 bytes) 2007-01-19, 22:35:48 (121660)

加跟贴