送交者: steven 于 2007-01-03, 01:28:22:

回答: 逐条反驳 由 揍汉奸 于 2007-01-03, 01:20:10:

• 在这里 - 揍汉奸 (166 bytes) 2007-01-03, 01:44:09 (118100)
  • I don't know who did the translation, or you need to check your reference. - steven (461 bytes) 2007-01-03, 02:26:52 (118101)
    • 我指的是中译本第一卷 - 揍汉奸 (1239 bytes) 2007-01-03, 09:29:44 (118128)
      • meant that the book had given the American perspective of the incident (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-01-03, 10:21:17 (118152)
        • 其过程和结果基本跟中国方面的记载一致吧 - 揍汉奸 (177 bytes) 2007-01-03, 13:33:36 (118207)
          • I've never read 中国方面的记载. Unless someone did a - steven (261 bytes) 2007-01-03, 14:59:05 (118228)
            • 研究战史当然是双方的战史都要研究了 - 揍汉奸 (376 bytes) 2007-01-03, 16:39:04 (118247)
    • 连狡辩都这么没水平 (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2007-01-03, 04:26:45 (118107)
      • don't you read English? (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2007-01-03, 08:49:59 (118120)
      • 我要是美军就这样说我们伤亡了9千又怎么样照样打死你们上万人 - HunHunSheng (69 bytes) 2007-01-03, 08:40:00 (118117)
        • 你们的烈士陵园可以扩大我们的阿灵顿公墓也可以扩大 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2007-01-03, 08:42:01 (118118)

加跟贴