crusader and comanche got cut not because of failure.

送交者: steven 于 2006-09-29, 13:33:39:

回答: 美军的十字军火炮和科曼其非了多少钱？由 ak70 于 2006-09-29, 13:16:20:

They were canciled because of mission objective had changed since. Both had gone through the DEM/VAL phase, and were in EMD phase.

所有跟贴:

You two are talking about different issues. Orange =/ apple - AI (155 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:07:39 (105151)
- I wasn't confused, I was pointing out the facts about those - steven (38 bytes) 2006-09-29, 16:07:18 (105188)
这要看你从什么角度定义“失败”一词了。 (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 14:42:45 (105134)
- 比如comanche，花了一大笔钱却发现它的实际意义不大。 - ak70 (72 bytes) 2006-09-29, 14:46:42 (105136)
  - things change, it was design during the cold war and for - steven (648 bytes) 2006-09-29, 14:55:02 (105143)
    - 造价过高的原因之一就是研发成本提高，F22现在就面临这种情况 (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 14:58:04 (105146)
      - that is not ture. You don't know how defense contract works. - steven (274 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:09:25 (105152)
        
        我指的是政府“已经“花在研发上的钱，军火商的损失不算 (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:27:05 (105165)
        
        told you don't know this work, R&D can either be funded - steven (250 bytes) 2006-09-29, 16:02:41 (105185)
        
        You need a little more lesson about how DOD runs contracts - AI (149 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:32:49 (105171)
        
        这跟大规模生产有什么关系？ (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:36:34 (105173)
        
        谁能保证投的钱就一定能赚回来: agree - AI (37 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:49:54 (105178)
        
        看来你是误解了 - ak70 (206 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:46:36 (105177)
        
        the hard drive, you argued for, is meant for mass production (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:38:22 (105174)
        
        正如你所说 - ak70 (110 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:31:52 (105170)
        
        Apollo project was pure research, and it spent more than 100B. - steven (107 bytes) 2006-09-29, 16:10:43 (105190)
      - 另外十字军火炮化的钱也不下十几亿美金了吧？ (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:00:58 (105148)
        
        btw, don't just read those "Chinese src," they were pretty - steven (108 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:12:03 (105154)
        
        这是在简氏防务报上看到的，不过哪一期的记不请了 (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 15:25:28 (105163)
        
        so it constitutes as hearsay. No src is given, nor it fit the fact. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2006-09-29, 16:13:27 (105192)
        
        The project you'd mentioned are in US military budgets of - steven (97 bytes) 2006-09-30, 11:54:24 (105279)
        
        非得是那些参加过的人，可有如何证明那些人参加过呢？ (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-30, 04:36:44 (105255)
        
        另外你说它不是真的，那怎么的来的消息才是真的？ (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-30, 04:27:13 (105254)
        
        这有不是什么机密 (无内容) - ak70 (0 bytes) 2006-09-30, 04:26:08 (105253)

加跟贴