things change, it was design during the cold war and for
所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛
送交者: steven 于 2006-09-29, 14:55:02:
回答: 比如comanche，花了一大笔钱却发现它的实际意义不大。 由 ak70 于 2006-09-29, 14:46:42:
the cold war. The cost increase because deployment delay. On the other hand, the cost is estimated, no one have to pay if don't deploy. That is how the US government control the cost just like the Business traval always buy full ticket fare, becase it can be return with full among. As long as the Comanche EMD does not start, it is only a couple million of R&D. When situation change, the project get canciled. Boeing started working on UAV, Sikorsky still has black hawk and Sea King. There is really nothing lose. A couple of millions as part of the defense research is quit reasonable. It is very different from billions of investment lost.
所有跟贴:
加跟贴