HunHun, coments about: 解放军演习场面震撼坦克集群排山倒海冲锋

HunHun, coments about: 解放军演习场面震撼坦克集群排山倒海冲锋

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: AI 于 2006-09-06, 12:56:51:

will this work?

http://news.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=news&MsgID=305972

现实的说，这样的坦克集团加上平原“战场”，想象敌更象邻国俄国 (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:06:21 (101299)
- 北京军区的假想敌最早就是老毛子。 - xinku (148 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:21:11 (101307)
  - 可老毛子是有不少的武装直升机 (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:30:48 (101313)
    - 只要你敢和他打到底他就经不起消耗阿富汗就是例子 - HunHunSheng (95 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:38:17 (101316)
      - 我是说武直是坦克的克星，这样的演习没有空中掩护是浪费钱和扯淡 (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:43:51 (101317)
        
        班竹说了至少这可以活动活动筋骨 - HunHunSheng (58 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:49:11 (101319)
  - 当初的计划使用一个军抵挡人家的一个师其实这个计划是可行的苏联根本没那么多师 - HunHunSheng (36 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:29:19 (101312)
  - 国内军坛愤青吹一个38军可抵3个美国重装师，应该老毛子怕才对：P (无内容) - 炎阳 (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:23:50 (101308)
    - 现代战争好像流氓打架，比的不是实力，而是看谁更狠。 - 组胚 (202 bytes) 2006-09-06, 21:28:41 (101394)
    - 老毛子一个重装狮抵几个老美重装师？ (无内容) - xinku (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:27:18 (101311)
      - 0.7? (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:07:18 (101327)
- 想象敌更象民晕，XX功，上访人员：P (无内容) - 炎阳 (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:13:52 (101303)
国防大学35位专家教授--was Zhang Zhaozhong there? (无内容) - Hoffman (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:52:44 (101291)
- 绝对有。世无张少将，万古如长夜：P (无内容) - 炎阳 (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:16:40 (101305)
世界上有几个国家有阿帕奇? 打不过有的还可以打没有的. (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:05:16 (101266)
- 美军还真有趣，拿当年的敌人名字来命名自己的武器。 - 蓝隼 (136 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:21:51 (101283)
- “前方‘敌’步战车1.2公里，请求炮兵歼灭！”炮弹直捣目标 - AI (150 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:23:30 (101269)
  - the friendly fire could have killed the person asking for artilary support - steven (140 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:51:56 (101321)
    - 呼叫自己的炮火把自己和敌人一块打本来就是一种战术 (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:06:14 (101326)
      - that's a pla tactic? (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:17:28 (101332)
        
        你的态度 is : 美军怎么着别人就该怎么着否则就是傻逼 - HunHunSheng (493 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:33:51 (101338)
        
        knowing what is wrong and still don't change is stupid. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 18:05:45 (101349)
        
        First it is not necessarily wrong. - HunHunSheng (315 bytes) 2006-09-06, 18:37:15 (101357)
        
        why not have pilots flying mig-17s or mig-19s to do Kamikaze attack? - steven (118 bytes) 2006-09-06, 19:59:07 (101370)
        
        If that is the only way given circumtances, people will do it (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-07, 07:29:06 (101448)
        
        历史上有的是这样的examples (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:21:58 (101335)
        
        黑山阻击战国民党军据说也是如此日军攻打北洋水师 - HunHunSheng (88 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:53:40 (101342)
        
        Egypt always took advantges when there was dogfight in the air - HunHunSheng (66 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:23:36 (101336)
有屁用，一架阿帕奇就可报销一个坦克营。啥年月了，还在搞坦克人海战术 (无内容) - 炎阳 (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:03:19 (101265)
- 阿帕奇用打吗，在伊拉克，阿富汗自己‘掉’下来多少了？ - 戏秦高僧 (119 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:36:12 (101286)
  - 见过阿帕奇吗？知道A-10的厉害吗？ - true (62 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:18:35 (101334)
  - 军事白痴才会对掉两架飞机大惊小怪，要看出勤率对事故率之比 - 炎阳 (223 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:43:37 (101289)
    - 掉架飞机事小，死个美国兵事大。你丫刚到美国吧，连这都不懂，一边凉快去。 - 戏秦高僧 (74 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:25:51 (101337)
      - Listen to what they said to a widow of a diseased american soldier - PhonyDoctorPhD (313 bytes) 2006-09-06, 17:39:52 (101344)
      - 怎么不敢? (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:42:59 (101340)
  - 你也不对有时候正规军远不如乌合之众难对付 - HunHunSheng (103 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:40:31 (101288)
    - 美军现在能在正规战场上打败解放军 - HunHunSheng (60 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:46:07 (101290)
      - 我也觉的PLA正规战远不如美军，但剿匪应远超美军。 (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:59:55 (101324)
      - PLA doesn't have the ability to support a international disaster relief - steven (58 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:53:09 (101292)
        
        Assuming they were transpostred there - HunHunSheng (191 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:56:11 (101294)
        
        who is gonna provide the logistics? weapon, food, fuel - steven (175 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:06:06 (101298)
        
        That is. If USA stand by and China want to find a small African country to screw - HunHunSheng (71 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:16:47 (101306)
        
        It is politics not militray capabilities - HunHunSheng (281 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:14:41 (101304)
        
        Just look at the Tsunami relief, China wasn't even there. - steven (80 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:46:56 (101318)
        
        A poor job will become best jobs if there is no alternative (无内容) - HunHunSheng (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:52:23 (101322)
        
        chances are, there are alternatives, many other alternatives. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 16:09:13 (101329)
        
        China is not needed for apparent reason - HunHunSheng (30 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:50:53 (101320)
- 那你不说一个单兵对空导弹就可以把阿帕奇敲下来？ - 蓝隼 (332 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:07:13 (101280)
  - 1. 阿帕奇腹部装有极厚防护装甲，可对护单兵对空导弹 - 炎阳 (306 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:20:14 (101282)
    - 打不穿装甲直接命中肯定也给震下来了，就像导弹打坦克，打不 - macland (48 bytes) 2006-09-06, 21:37:07 (101396)
    - war isn't that simple, and stinger missile can surely shoot down - steven (11 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:56:01 (101293)
      - well, under ideal scenario, it may. - 炎阳 (192 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:01:54 (101296)
        
        stinger is responsible for shooting 300+ Russian aircrafts - steven (685 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:34:01 (101314)
      - 掉一架阵亡两个在补充一架就可以了除了家属也没人会把它当成大事情 - HunHunSheng (79 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:01:29 (101295)
    - 哈，单兵导弹打飞机一次只能发一枚么？ - 蓝隼 (268 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:30:00 (101285)
- Tanks are still useful although it is more and more limited. (无内容) - PhonyDoctorPhD (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:19:12 (101267)
  - 只要战争的胜负还是以步兵踏上对方的阵地来算的，坦克就不会过时 - 蓝隼 (74 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:16:48 (101281)
    - 没有强大的空中掩护，坦克集群就是阿帕奇的活靶子，一一报销 (无内容) - 炎阳 (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:23:02 (101284)
      - 979打越南的时候根本没有空中掩护损失比较大但是谈不上全报销 - HunHunSheng (38 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:38:20 (101287)
  - in the real battle, US won't allow enemy to form large column of tanks - 炎阳 (581 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:29:48 (101271)
    - US is not and should not be the only enemy, though most FQ thought so (无内容) - PhonyDoctorPhD (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:35:45 (101315)
    - forget about US. how about Japan or Taiwan? (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:35:54 (101273)
      - 由武警和二炮配合 - BTS (14 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:48:57 (101275)
      - no use either. Even without involving of US force, PLA still can't beat T and J - 炎阳 (821 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:48:48 (101274)
        
        打越南还是打得不错的把凉山给打平了战争的目的就是让敌人miserable - HunHunSheng (157 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:55:54 (101277)
        
        如果让敌国每增加一个寡妇自己需要增加10个寡妇 - HunHunSheng (35 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:02:08 (101278)
        
        新月旗失色十字旗翩翩摩尔兵妻女痛哭阿非利加 - Lord Byron - HunHunSheng (1149 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:04:22 (101279)