送交者: PhonyDoctorPhD 于 2006-09-06, 13:19:12:

回答: 有屁用，一架阿帕奇就可报销一个坦克营。啥年月了，还在搞坦克人海战术 由 炎阳 于 2006-09-06, 13:03:19:

• 只要战争的胜负还是以步兵踏上对方的阵地来算的，坦克就不会过时 - 蓝隼 (74 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:16:48 (101281)
  • 没有强大的空中掩护，坦克集群就是阿帕奇的活靶子，一一报销 (无内容) - 炎阳 (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:23:02 (101284)
    • 979打越南的时候根本没有空中掩护损失比较大但是谈不上全报销 - HunHunSheng (38 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:38:20 (101287)
• in the real battle, US won't allow enemy to form large column of tanks - 炎阳 (581 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:29:48 (101271)
  • US is not and should not be the only enemy, though most FQ thought so (无内容) - PhonyDoctorPhD (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 15:35:45 (101315)
  • forget about US. how about Japan or Taiwan? (无内容) - AI (0 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:35:54 (101273)
    • 由武警和二炮配合 - BTS (14 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:48:57 (101275)
    • no use either. Even without involving of US force, PLA still can't beat T and J - 炎阳 (821 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:48:48 (101274)
      • 打越南还是打得不错的把凉山给打平了战争的目的就是让敌人miserable - HunHunSheng (157 bytes) 2006-09-06, 13:55:54 (101277)
        • 如果让敌国每增加一个寡妇自己需要增加10个寡妇 - HunHunSheng (35 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:02:08 (101278)
          • 新月旗失色十字旗翩翩 摩尔兵妻女痛哭阿非利加 - Lord Byron - HunHunSheng (1149 bytes) 2006-09-06, 14:04:22 (101279)

加跟贴