送交者: yawl 于 2006-08-08, 13:17:56:

回答: 对声援方博士签名信的补充看法。 由 Nixrreg 于 2006-08-08, 13:01:22:

• 不需要，但反射弧需要 (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2006-08-08, 13:22:06 (97326)
  • 反射弧 is not invented by Xiao (无内容) - jxl (0 bytes) 2006-08-08, 13:28:52 (97328)
    • but that's not the point! (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2006-08-08, 13:59:13 (97337)
      • 谁叫你鉴定反射弧了？官司打的是它是否“获国际认同” (无内容) - yawl (0 bytes) 2006-08-08, 14:03:07 (97339)
        • You guys don't know how the court works or what? - skipper3 (692 bytes) 2006-08-08, 14:45:24 (97348)
          • you don't know what they are arguing here? - eng (107 bytes) 2006-08-08, 14:58:12 (97351)
        • 不在其位，不言其见 (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2006-08-08, 14:16:01 (97342)
          • 就是，吕大人不懂学术，如何评判？ (无内容) - eng (0 bytes) 2006-08-08, 14:42:03 (97346)
            • No, no, no, this is a wrong perception. - Nixrreg (186 bytes) 2006-08-08, 15:41:36 (97355)
              • What's the purpose of "expressing feeling"? - skipper3 (673 bytes) 2006-08-08, 21:00:17 (97382)
              • exactly - eng (472 bytes) 2006-08-08, 16:08:27 (97363)

加跟贴