%%仟囂某(www.xys.org)(xys.dxiong.com)(xys.3322.org)(xys.dyndns.info)%%   From scientist to 'science policeman'   Jia Hepeng   (China Daily 08/18/2005 page14)   When Fang Shimin went to the United States for a doctoral degree in biological chemistry in 1990, he did not expect his life would be linked to writing articles of criticism and analysis instead of labs and microscopes.   "At that time, I wanted to be a scientist, but now, I am widely called a science policeman," said Fang, whose alias is Fang Zhouzi, best known in public for his criticisms of pseudoscience.   Born in Fujian Province in 1967, Fang was an excellent student at Hefei-based University of Science and Technology of China (USTC). He was admitted by the Michigan State University to learn biochemistry after graduating from USTC.   On arriving in the United States, what attracted Fang most was not molecules or DNA, but the emerging Usenet, the precedent of the Internet.   Life tied to the Internet   "Among others, overseas Chinese students were the first group to access the computer network. The efficiency and convenience of the network attracted me to do something with the new tool," Fang said.   He thought of digitalizing ancient Chinese poems. With his and other Chinese students' efforts, voluntarily inputting lots of material, they set up a large online database of ancient Chinese poems.   Meanwhile, Fang and his friends tried to develop a literature website, xys.org, otherwise known as New Threads.   But another career soon lured him away from building Internet portals.   "When I came to the United States, I found many conservative religious groups quite active among overseas Chinese students," said Fang.   "I recognized religious freedom, but I cannot accept many false theories that attack Darwinism."   One such theory is the so-called theory of "scientific" creationism, which jumbles up so-called natural discoveries to refute Darwin's evolution theories.   As a biology researcher, Fang took up his pen to write articles on the emerging Internet medium to refute these theories.   "I did not think my articles would be so popular. So many overseas Chinese students read them and gave their comments," Fang said.   He soon found a new target to attack a group of so-called paranormal power "masters," who became nationally famous in China in 1980s by promoting their special, somewhat supernatural, prowess.   One "master" claimed he could repair broken bones in several minutes by generating qigong (breathing exercises), while another said the success of putting out a big fire in Daxing'anling Mountains in Northeast China in 1997 was because of his magic spells in Beijing.   In the early 1990s, Sima Nan, a science communicator, and scientists such as He Zuoxiu, a physician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), rose to expose the sham and the prevalence of those "masters."   "Unable to cheat people in China, many of the 'masters' went to the United States to seek audiences among overseas Chinese students," Fang said.   One day one of his friends went to attend a lecture held by a so-called master. Each member of the audience was charged US$600 because the master claimed his speech could create an energy field and could cure diseases of the listeners or protect them against disease.   That motivated Fang to do something on behalf of true science.   He began to write series of online articles refuting the various pseudoscience theories behind the so-called supernatural power.   "If they have so-called magic biological electricity waves, why can't scientists detect and publish the results in academic journals?" asked Fang.   A Hong Kong-based editor collected his online articles against "scientific" creationism theories and other pseudoscience "masters" and compiled them into the book "New Interpretation on Evolution" in 1997.   On home ground   In 1995, Fang got his doctoral degree, and then did postdoctoral studies at Rochester University and the California-based Salk Institute.   During his postdoctoral studies, he found academic research no longer interested him. He felt that as a researcher, one had to repeatedly deal with funding agencies in a routine way.   In 1998, Fang returned to China for the first time after a span of eight years.   To his astonishment, he saw pseudoscience books in bookstores, covering themes from fortune-telling, physiognomy, untested magical phenomena to some unknown "new sciences."   "One such science is called holographic biology, which claims that all the biological information of a creature can be traced from the hidden signals in part of its organs. For trees, it is leaves, and for man, it is one's palms," Fang said.   Fang decided to give up his biological studies to write columns for home media and publishers to refute what he considers pseudoscience.   The turning point came when the Fa_lun_gong cult was on the rise in China and the United States. Its practitioners claimed Fa_lun_gong's creator had mastered the science governing the whole history, universe, human beings and the spirit.   Since 1998, Fang, mainly based in the United States, has written articles one after another unravelling the loopholes in the preachings of Fa_lun_gong, on his website xys.org.   The prevalence of pseudoscience has its reasons, Fang said.   "Chinese lacks the spirit of skepticism, rationality and empiricism. For example, most people never test the truth of some cheating theories or practices even with basic scientific theories, as in the case of turning water into oil," he said.   In the early 1990s, Wang Hongcheng claimed he had found a way of transforming water into gasoline, using just a few additives.   "Anyone who has a basic knowledge of physics or chemistry would know the practice is contradictory to the law of energy conservation and the molecular structure of water," Fang said.   But few challenged Wang and he made 300 million yuan (US$ 37 million) before being found guilty of deceit and fraud and jailed for 10 years in 1998.   There is low scientific literacy in Chinese society today. A 2003 national survey on scientific literacy by the China Association for Science and Technology shows that the percentage of Chinese who believe in fengshui the art of deciding the design of objects to bring good luck was 39 per cent, while those believing in samsara, or the return of life, accounted for 11.5 per cent of the population.   Some people have made use of people's zeal for learning science and for scientific development to their own advantage by promoting their pseudoscience ideas in the name of science, according to Tian Song, associate professor of philosophy of science at Beijing Normal University.   Fang said the rising commercialism in Chinese society enables the pseudoscience "masters" to bribe some media and even professional scientists to propagandize and prove their theories. As a result, Fang believes his work of identifying and exposing pseudoscience is made even more valuable.   Rising disputes   As well as the "masters" with "supernatural powers" and cult leaders, Fang has also exposed swindles by health food companies and by some science professionals.   In 2000, Fang debunked a US-trained female Chinese biologist who was branded a "gene queen" due to her donation of a gene library to China.   He said the biologist, who did not have a doctorate, was merely a lab technician and her "gene library" could be bought everywhere in the United States for a few thousand dollars. He claimed that her work was far from making her a "gene queen."   In 2001 he pointed out that the nucleic acid health food produced by a Dalian-based company had long been revealed as a scientific fraud by Nobel laureates in the United States.   In 2002, Fang targeted his criticism at academic corruption. He made it public that several famous natural and social scientists from Peking, Tsinghua universities and USTC, his alma mater, had committed plagiarism, copying from foreign scientists' works and papers for their own works.   "At first, my alma mater was proud of my criticism, but when it became a target, the praise suddenly disappeared," Fang said.   But he said he did not care.   "As long as I have evidence, I will continue my criticism and revelation of pseudoscience and academic plagiarism," he said. "I do not have a material pursuit and do not care if this means I lose chances of making money."   Most of the evidence Fang has used to expose pseudoscience and academic plagiarism has so far stood up to scrutiny.   But his practice has been increasingly reproached.   Liu Huajie, an associate professor of science communication at Peking University, said Fang abused the public confidence in him. Some of his criticism against so-called pseudoscience and academic plagiarism has not been double-checked, and "if he is wrong, the result would be disastrous."   Tian said Fang has gone to extremes with his approach to "put everything not having been proved by modern analytical science, such as classic theories of traditional Chinese medicine, as pseudoscience."   Since early this year, Fang has been widely criticized by environmentalists for his claim that human beings should not pay homage to nature.   Last December, the strong earthquake and tsunami caused great destruction in the countries surrounding the Indian Ocean. Some environmentalists pointed out that great disaster should make people become more respectful of the nature. In fact, the human destruction of the coastal ecological environments such as red groves aggravated the tsunami disaster.   But Fang said protecting ecological environments has nothing to do with homage to nature. If human beings do so, they should only use nature to serve themselves as people. He said the so called homage to nature is a pseudoscience.   As a result, he has been seriously criticized by environmentalists.   Fang has faced the criticism squarely.   "Each time I plan to criticize somebody, I carefully prepare my evidence and my reasoning, so I avoid making the wrong judgments as much as possible," Fang said. (XYS20050818) %%仟囂某(www.xys.org)(xys.dxiong.com)(xys.3322.org)(xys.dyndns.info)%%